When it comes to proposals for climate change policy, most studies indicate technological efforts : some, fiscal measures.
Few, if any, really consider the pragmatic likelihood of their proposals being taken up.
I’d like to offer the first in a series of totally made-up statistics to show my view on the likelihood of some of these proposals being implementable (or is that “implementible” ?) and efficacious (effective).
I honestly don’t know why the media continue to discuss and discuss the merits and/or disbenefits of new nuclear power and geoengineering (which includes Carbon Capture and Storage or CCS).
They are not likely to be able to help in the next few decades, and so they might as well not be on the proposals table or board.