Bad Science Bait & Switch Climate Change Non-Science Obamawatch Political Nightmare Public Relations Social Change The Data Toxic Hazard Unutterably Useless

Climategate : Too Tired To Resist ?

George Monbiot has written another post on his The Guardian weblog, anxiously chewing his own lips to bloody shreds with the stress of the Climategate situation :-

“Pretending the climate email leak isn’t a crisis won’t make it go away : Climate sceptics have lied, obscured and cheated for years. That’s why we climate rationalists must uphold the highest standards of science : Posted by George Monbiot : Wednesday 25 November 2009 : I have seldom felt so alone. Confronted with crisis, most of the environmentalists I know have gone into denial. The emails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia, they say, are a storm in a tea cup, no big deal, exaggerated out of all recognition. It is true that climate change deniers have made wild claims which the material can’t possibly support (the end of global warming, the death of climate science). But it is also true that the emails are very damaging. The response of the greens and most of the scientists I know is profoundly ironic, as we spend so much of our time confronting other people’s denial. Pretending that this isn’t a real crisis isn’t going to make it go away. Nor is an attempt to justify the emails with technicalities. We’ll be able to get past this only by grasping reality, apologising where appropriate and demonstrating that it cannot happen again. It is true that much of what has been revealed could be explained as the usual cut and thrust of the peer review process, exacerbated by the extraordinary pressure the scientists were facing from a denial industry determined to crush them…”

Look, George love, we’d like to do something useful, but the problem is one of sheer exhaustion. People are tired of the relentless waves of hysteria and mania coming from the “denial community”. Nothing we say makes them stop, not even for one second. On and on they moan and clatter and hammer.

Plus, we do all have other things we really should be doing, like living, talking to our spice (is that the real plural of “spouse” ?), earning a living, cooking lunch, that kind of stuff. Having to turn 180 degrees, sharp left or whatever metaphor is appropriate, and applying ourselves to the abstract concepts of the intimate details of a broad range of Climate Change scientific fact and what the data all means, correcting denial propaganda and outright non-science nonsense, well, that all feels rather taxing.

Whose job is it to counteract the Climate Change sceptical malaise ? Isn’t there somebody high up, a Government official or a Minister or something that could come on the telly and tell the nation to calm down, it’s only a crowd of troublemakers, actually the reality of Global Warming is worse than it was even just a few months ago, and yes, the floods Up North were quite probably something to do with the changing weather ?

Why should the job of unpicking the denialist arguments be left to independent or freelance writers, people in charitable organisations or students with a bit of free time on their hands ?

Climategate will all blow over, eventually, like a shed in a slightly stronger hurricane. The truth will out. Out the punishments will be meted. Some more education will be made available for people to help them re-orient their views.

Yes, some science guys exchanged some botched e-mails. Big deal. The IPCC reports still stand. Obama is coming to Copenhagen with a promise of 83% by 2050 from a 2005 baseline in his warm, smart, capable and friendly hands.

I know Climategate is a real crisis, but it’s not that big a crisis for me to totally re-prioritise my life. Climate Change is the real crisis, and that already takes up a significant proportion of my waking hours.

In my view, Climategate only really damages the people who “liberated” the e-mails from CRU. What a shambolic midden of thieving cowards, say I.

3 replies on “Climategate : Too Tired To Resist ?”

I like what George writes mostly, but in this case I think he has lost the plot. I think he is not far wrong when he saids that climate gate is a crisis. I don’t think I’d call it a crisis but a major blow yes. The new denialists topics to come out climategate will be repeated over and over again, long after they have been debunked in exactly the same way as every other climate denial topic that has been debunked. We will have a new legion of zombies to fight.

I think his despair as a result of climategate has done this. He wants it to be over, and over quickly and thinks that the sacrifice of one individual it will stop it in its tracks. He is wrong, it wont satiate the blood lust of the climate deniers. They will see what works, they’ll steal more e-mails and more scientists will be called into question. Not because they are unethical but because it is always going to be easy to cherry pick your interpretation of e-mails sent between close colleagues in exactly the way this episode has demonstrated.

George lacks the courage and determination of Gavin Schmidt at real climate. If George really wanted the damage to be limited as quickly as possible he should have followed the approach of Schmidt. He should have asked the Guardian to allow him to moderate the discussion on cif in a response to one of his comment or blog pieces. As climategate has been exposed for what it is by providing the context of every contentious piece we can see that there is no real fraud or corruption.

George’s response makes it look like there is.


Totally agree with Kevin. George has lost the plot. As his kid gets older he will realise the value of choosing which issues to make an issue of.

“People are tired of the relentless waves of hysteria and mania coming from the “denial community”. Nothing we say makes them stop, not even for one second. On and on they moan and clatter and hammer.”

Getting sceptics to stop shouldn’t be difficult. Just get the AGW scientists to make freely available their completely unadulterated raw data, their code and the reasoning behind their “adjustments”. That would reduce the argument to one of science, as you would like, instead of politics which is what we have now. The debate goes on because it’s clear that AGW scientists do not want to share the workings behind their findings. Instead of saying “here is my data, here are my corrections and here is my conclusion” all we’re getting is “here is my conclusion – now f**k off”.

Don’t even try to suggest that the raw data has been made available. The CRU has even destroyed, sorry, “lost” its data. The satellite data at RSS and UAH is calibrated against “adjusted” output from Phil Jones and his cohorts so we can’t even rely on what should be very accurate satellite readings.

I think a good test of an AGW scientist’s independence on the issue would be to ask, “If you could click your fingers and do away with global warming completely, would you do so?” I suspect econutters and premature cli-maxers like yourself would rather keep global warming, despite all the problems it would cause if true, because it enables you to implement your environmental agenda.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.