<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jo Abbess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joabbess.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joabbess.com</link>
	<description>Energy Change for Climate Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Does GWPF Really Stand For ? by Irene</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/02/01/what-does-gwpf-really-stand-for/comment-page-1/#comment-128606</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12863#comment-128606</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;[ UPDATE FROM JOABBESS.COM : THIS COMMENT WAS MARKED AS BEING FROM SOMEBODY WITH AN E-MAIL ADDRESS &quot;Irony@irony.meter&quot; AND A WEBSITE &quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony&quot;. WE COULD THEREFORE CONCLUDE THAT THIS COMMENT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE SARCASTICALLY. JUST SAYING, BEFORE Y&#039;ALL TAKE IT TOO SERIOUSLY. ]&lt;/B&gt;

I must have read about a hundred articles like this over the last week from Jo and other wonderful environmental activists. They are doing great work exposing the GWPF. 

But there is a need for more articles about how oil money is being used to promote groups like them. Not until every news channel covers this story every day will the public understand how the oil companies promote and publicise deniers groups like the GWPF. Everyone should know that the GWPF is publicised by oil money. We have to tell everybody about the GWPF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>[ UPDATE FROM JOABBESS.COM : THIS COMMENT WAS MARKED AS BEING FROM SOMEBODY WITH AN E-MAIL ADDRESS "Irony@irony.meter" AND A WEBSITE "http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony". WE COULD THEREFORE CONCLUDE THAT THIS COMMENT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE SARCASTICALLY. JUST SAYING, BEFORE Y'ALL TAKE IT TOO SERIOUSLY. ]</b></p>
<p>I must have read about a hundred articles like this over the last week from Jo and other wonderful environmental activists. They are doing great work exposing the GWPF. </p>
<p>But there is a need for more articles about how oil money is being used to promote groups like them. Not until every news channel covers this story every day will the public understand how the oil companies promote and publicise deniers groups like the GWPF. Everyone should know that the GWPF is publicised by oil money. We have to tell everybody about the GWPF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on George Monbiot&#8217;s Parochial Frame by Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/george-monbiots-parochial-frame/comment-page-1/#comment-127716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12825#comment-127716</guid>
		<description>To imagine that social class and possession of savings are unconnected seems very puzzling. You might have a look at http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/14176/1/14176.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To imagine that social class and possession of savings are unconnected seems very puzzling. You might have a look at <a href="http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/14176/1/14176.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/14176/1/14176.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on War Gaming Iran (2) by Ron Mortimer</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/17/war-gaming-iran-2/comment-page-1/#comment-127671</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Mortimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12807#comment-127671</guid>
		<description>Hi Jo 

Good for you to keep  writing of the lies being used to set Iran up for attack.

The powers that be think we all will get bored if they proceed slowly enough, and they may be right about most people. They have been playing this game for a long time and so know how to defuse opposition , either by lies or in this case the boredom and self-absorption of the majority of the affluent western populations.

You seem a believer in the &quot;Peak Oil&quot; theory. I am agnostic on the issue though I do note that most markets are rigged and don&#039;t see any reason to exclude the oil market. By rigged, I mean as most markets , most pots of money just sitting there will attract the scammers of this world. Pretty normal  when one thinks about it, that professionals will run markets for their own benefit. I don&#039;t know of any remedy that isn&#039;t worse than the disease thoughBTW.
I am only saying the above as we don&#039;t( protestations of the Peak Oilers notwithstanding) really know how much oil is really out there with any real certainty. I would suggest that as the oil market is a/ vitally important to individual producer countries as well as the world as a whole and b/ involves enormous amounts of money, that it is in the market participant&#039;s interests to make it as opaque as possible. If there were perceived to be plentiful oil out there, it would undermine the &quot;scarcity mentality&quot; of the consumers and lead to consumer resistance of high prices instead of acceptance as we do now for the most part.
If anything, the US would like to deny resources to their rivals, the Chinese. And the Chinese are a big buyer of Iranian oil. And even worse, the Iranians are willing to do business in currencies other than USD. That is the a core reason for attack(one of many). Saddam Hussein made the same mistake, as well as Gaddhafi, selling oil for non US currencies.

It&#039;s always about the money.

cheers     Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jo </p>
<p>Good for you to keep  writing of the lies being used to set Iran up for attack.</p>
<p>The powers that be think we all will get bored if they proceed slowly enough, and they may be right about most people. They have been playing this game for a long time and so know how to defuse opposition , either by lies or in this case the boredom and self-absorption of the majority of the affluent western populations.</p>
<p>You seem a believer in the &#8220;Peak Oil&#8221; theory. I am agnostic on the issue though I do note that most markets are rigged and don&#8217;t see any reason to exclude the oil market. By rigged, I mean as most markets , most pots of money just sitting there will attract the scammers of this world. Pretty normal  when one thinks about it, that professionals will run markets for their own benefit. I don&#8217;t know of any remedy that isn&#8217;t worse than the disease thoughBTW.<br />
I am only saying the above as we don&#8217;t( protestations of the Peak Oilers notwithstanding) really know how much oil is really out there with any real certainty. I would suggest that as the oil market is a/ vitally important to individual producer countries as well as the world as a whole and b/ involves enormous amounts of money, that it is in the market participant&#8217;s interests to make it as opaque as possible. If there were perceived to be plentiful oil out there, it would undermine the &#8220;scarcity mentality&#8221; of the consumers and lead to consumer resistance of high prices instead of acceptance as we do now for the most part.<br />
If anything, the US would like to deny resources to their rivals, the Chinese. And the Chinese are a big buyer of Iranian oil. And even worse, the Iranians are willing to do business in currencies other than USD. That is the a core reason for attack(one of many). Saddam Hussein made the same mistake, as well as Gaddhafi, selling oil for non US currencies.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always about the money.</p>
<p>cheers     Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on War Gaming Iran (3) : &#8220;Wretched tyrant&#8221; : David Cameron calls out Bashar al-Assad by Paul Felix Schott</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/war-gaming-iran-3-wretched-tyrant-david-cameron-calls-out-bashar-al-assad/comment-page-1/#comment-126584</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Felix Schott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12821#comment-126584</guid>
		<description>If you think or believed that Israel-Iran relations will improve.

Just read this

1997
Iranian President Mohammad Khatami,
 called Israel an
&quot;illegal state and a &quot;parasite,&quot;

The Iranian Chief of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps,
&quot;The IRGC&quot;
Mohammad Ali Jafari
said &quot;Israel was within the reach of Iranian missiles&quot;.
IRGC is listed by the U.S. Government as a terrorist organization.
With many ties to an assassination campaigns in the
1980s and early 1990s with paid mercenaries from many countries
that targeted many opponents, and rigged elections.

December 2000
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei he has called Israel many things even went as far as to say it is a
&quot;cancerous tumor&quot; that should be removed from the region.
&quot;Act Of War&quot; against Israel.

JULY 2008
Iran&#039;s foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki said &quot;that Israel was
not capable of an attack&quot;.

JULY 2008
Ahmadinejad.....he said, &quot;The Iranian nation never recognized Israel
and will never ever recognize it.

Iran&#039;s Supreme Leader Khamenei he stated, &quot;It is incorrect, irrational,
pointless and nonsense to say that we are friends of Israeli people...
we are on a collision course with the occupiers of Palestine and the
occupiers are the Zionist regime. This is the position of our regime,
our revolution and our people.&quot;

February 7, 2010, Iran&#039;s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said
&quot;the destruction of Israel was assured&quot; According to the daily newspaper  Teheran Times.
Another &quot;Act Of War&quot; against Israel.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s chief of staff, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei,
said &quot;that if Israel attacked Iran it would be destroyed within a week&quot;

Iranian Funding of the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah
A mural in Tehran, Iran. The mural depicts the emblem of Lebanon&#039;s Hezbollah,
and quotes the founder of The Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, saying:
&quot;Israel must be destroyed.&quot;
Another &quot;Act Of War&quot; against them.

Iran has been for years suppling weapons and political support to Hamas an
organization that is committed to the destruction of Israel by Jihad  According
to Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority, &quot;Hamas is funded
By Iran.
It has claimed it has been financed by peace loving donations, but the donations
they get are nothing at all like what it receives from Iran for its
Wicked Deeds and acts. All the Big Bankers of the World can see this.
Another &quot;Act Of War&quot; against Israel.

Iran is also suppling another enemy of Israel, the well know terrorist organization
Hezbollah with more then what you would call just a substantial amount of financial
support and weapons, explosives and training of how to use them and political,
diplomatic, and organizational aid while persuading Hezbollah to take wicked actions
against Israel. Hezbollah&#039;s 1985 manifesto listed its four main goals as &quot;Israel&#039;s
final departure from Lebanon as a prelude to its final obliteration&quot; According to
reports released in February 2010, Hezbollah has received $400 million dollars from
Iran. That the World knows about.
Another Clear &quot;Act Of War&quot; against Israel.

October 11, 2011 the CIA AND THE FBI Of tha United States Of America stoped a
terrorist plot by the Iranian Government Leaders that included (bombing the Israeli
&quot;as well as Saudi&quot;
Embassies in Washington, DC and Buenos Aires).
All Nations involved do claim this as 
An &quot;Act Of War&quot; against them.

Can you carry a Bible in Iran with out them trying to kill you.
 Devil at war with God.

Israel Will Strike Iran, British Intelligence is now saying.

The 43rd President George W. Bush’s National Security Adviser and Chief Foreign Policy Adviser Stephen Hadley is now Warning the world. That there clearly exists a very high risk to say the least that Iran and the United States very soon will most likely end up in a military conflict. As the deterioration of views and political relations between Iran and many other countries as Iran Leader acts more like a little kid. Making all the Middle East more unstable.

With growing reports out of Israel that an attack on Iran&#039;s nuclear facilities is likely, former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice  told  Ron Kessler of Newsmax&#039;s in an one on one interview that she has no doubts in her mind that Israel will take the necessary actions to stop Iran&#039;s mullahs from making or getting Nuclear Weapons. Condoleezza Rice has a book,  Called &quot;No Higher Honor&quot; A Memoir of My Years in Washington,&quot; reveals her insights into the war against Al-Qaida, what really happened in Iraq, and the real rising threat of Iran.
From her work as the National Security Adviser with President George W. Bush in his first term before succeeding Colin Powell to become Secretary of State in his second term.

The Lord&#039;s Little Helper
Paul Felix Schott

GOD Bless You  and Your Love ones
Give thanks to our Lord Jesus Christ every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think or believed that Israel-Iran relations will improve.</p>
<p>Just read this</p>
<p>1997<br />
Iranian President Mohammad Khatami,<br />
 called Israel an<br />
&#8220;illegal state and a &#8220;parasite,&#8221;</p>
<p>The Iranian Chief of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps,<br />
&#8220;The IRGC&#8221;<br />
Mohammad Ali Jafari<br />
said &#8220;Israel was within the reach of Iranian missiles&#8221;.<br />
IRGC is listed by the U.S. Government as a terrorist organization.<br />
With many ties to an assassination campaigns in the<br />
1980s and early 1990s with paid mercenaries from many countries<br />
that targeted many opponents, and rigged elections.</p>
<p>December 2000<br />
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei he has called Israel many things even went as far as to say it is a<br />
&#8220;cancerous tumor&#8221; that should be removed from the region.<br />
&#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against Israel.</p>
<p>JULY 2008<br />
Iran&#8217;s foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki said &#8220;that Israel was<br />
not capable of an attack&#8221;.</p>
<p>JULY 2008<br />
Ahmadinejad&#8230;..he said, &#8220;The Iranian nation never recognized Israel<br />
and will never ever recognize it.</p>
<p>Iran&#8217;s Supreme Leader Khamenei he stated, &#8220;It is incorrect, irrational,<br />
pointless and nonsense to say that we are friends of Israeli people&#8230;<br />
we are on a collision course with the occupiers of Palestine and the<br />
occupiers are the Zionist regime. This is the position of our regime,<br />
our revolution and our people.&#8221;</p>
<p>February 7, 2010, Iran&#8217;s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said<br />
&#8220;the destruction of Israel was assured&#8221; According to the daily newspaper  Teheran Times.<br />
Another &#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against Israel.</p>
<p>Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s chief of staff, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei,<br />
said &#8220;that if Israel attacked Iran it would be destroyed within a week&#8221;</p>
<p>Iranian Funding of the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah<br />
A mural in Tehran, Iran. The mural depicts the emblem of Lebanon&#8217;s Hezbollah,<br />
and quotes the founder of The Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, saying:<br />
&#8220;Israel must be destroyed.&#8221;<br />
Another &#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against them.</p>
<p>Iran has been for years suppling weapons and political support to Hamas an<br />
organization that is committed to the destruction of Israel by Jihad  According<br />
to Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority, &#8220;Hamas is funded<br />
By Iran.<br />
It has claimed it has been financed by peace loving donations, but the donations<br />
they get are nothing at all like what it receives from Iran for its<br />
Wicked Deeds and acts. All the Big Bankers of the World can see this.<br />
Another &#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against Israel.</p>
<p>Iran is also suppling another enemy of Israel, the well know terrorist organization<br />
Hezbollah with more then what you would call just a substantial amount of financial<br />
support and weapons, explosives and training of how to use them and political,<br />
diplomatic, and organizational aid while persuading Hezbollah to take wicked actions<br />
against Israel. Hezbollah&#8217;s 1985 manifesto listed its four main goals as &#8220;Israel&#8217;s<br />
final departure from Lebanon as a prelude to its final obliteration&#8221; According to<br />
reports released in February 2010, Hezbollah has received $400 million dollars from<br />
Iran. That the World knows about.<br />
Another Clear &#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against Israel.</p>
<p>October 11, 2011 the CIA AND THE FBI Of tha United States Of America stoped a<br />
terrorist plot by the Iranian Government Leaders that included (bombing the Israeli<br />
&#8220;as well as Saudi&#8221;<br />
Embassies in Washington, DC and Buenos Aires).<br />
All Nations involved do claim this as<br />
An &#8220;Act Of War&#8221; against them.</p>
<p>Can you carry a Bible in Iran with out them trying to kill you.<br />
 Devil at war with God.</p>
<p>Israel Will Strike Iran, British Intelligence is now saying.</p>
<p>The 43rd President George W. Bush’s National Security Adviser and Chief Foreign Policy Adviser Stephen Hadley is now Warning the world. That there clearly exists a very high risk to say the least that Iran and the United States very soon will most likely end up in a military conflict. As the deterioration of views and political relations between Iran and many other countries as Iran Leader acts more like a little kid. Making all the Middle East more unstable.</p>
<p>With growing reports out of Israel that an attack on Iran&#8217;s nuclear facilities is likely, former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice  told  Ron Kessler of Newsmax&#8217;s in an one on one interview that she has no doubts in her mind that Israel will take the necessary actions to stop Iran&#8217;s mullahs from making or getting Nuclear Weapons. Condoleezza Rice has a book,  Called &#8220;No Higher Honor&#8221; A Memoir of My Years in Washington,&#8221; reveals her insights into the war against Al-Qaida, what really happened in Iraq, and the real rising threat of Iran.<br />
From her work as the National Security Adviser with President George W. Bush in his first term before succeeding Colin Powell to become Secretary of State in his second term.</p>
<p>The Lord&#8217;s Little Helper<br />
Paul Felix Schott</p>
<p>GOD Bless You  and Your Love ones<br />
Give thanks to our Lord Jesus Christ every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The UK&#8217;s Energy Crisis by Doug UK</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/20/the-uks-energy-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-125712</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12851#comment-125712</guid>
		<description>You do not want to contemplate Nuclear, Fracking, and Methyle hydrate.

No - thought not.

Living in a bubble still I see! :0)

&lt;B&gt;[ NOTE FROM JOABBESS.COM : METHYL HYDRATE IS USED AS AN ANTI-FREEZE AND SOLVENT AND IS ANOTHER NAME FOR METHANOL. I THINK THE COMMENTATOR MEANT TO TYPE &quot;METHANE HYDRATES&quot; ABOUT WHICH THERE HAS BEEN A &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.thegwpf.org/energy-news/4793-benny-peiser-another-energy-revolution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RECENT BUZZ&lt;/A&gt;. OR MAYBE THE WRITER DID ACTUALLY MEAN METHANOL, IN WHICH CASE IT&#039;S USEFUL TO NOTE THAT BIOMETHANOL COULD TURN OUT TO BE A USEFUL VEHICLE FUEL PRODUCT OF BIOREFINERY - EXCEEDINGLY USEFUL ONCE PEAK OIL REALLY BITES. ]&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do not want to contemplate Nuclear, Fracking, and Methyle hydrate.</p>
<p>No &#8211; thought not.</p>
<p>Living in a bubble still I see! :0)</p>
<p><b>[ NOTE FROM JOABBESS.COM : METHYL HYDRATE IS USED AS AN ANTI-FREEZE AND SOLVENT AND IS ANOTHER NAME FOR METHANOL. I THINK THE COMMENTATOR MEANT TO TYPE "METHANE HYDRATES" ABOUT WHICH THERE HAS BEEN A <a HREF="http://www.thegwpf.org/energy-news/4793-benny-peiser-another-energy-revolution.html" rel="nofollow">RECENT BUZZ</a>. OR MAYBE THE WRITER DID ACTUALLY MEAN METHANOL, IN WHICH CASE IT'S USEFUL TO NOTE THAT BIOMETHANOL COULD TURN OUT TO BE A USEFUL VEHICLE FUEL PRODUCT OF BIOREFINERY - EXCEEDINGLY USEFUL ONCE PEAK OIL REALLY BITES. ]</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The UK&#8217;s Energy Crisis by Rhisiart Gwilym</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/20/the-uks-energy-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-125690</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhisiart Gwilym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12851#comment-125690</guid>
		<description>Goodbye it is, Jo. There is in fact NO strategy, no mix of energy sources, no financial or economic policy which will maintain the current, simply unsustainable level of energy use in Britain; even if Russia turns out, in the event, to be a reliable medium-term supplier of natural gas to Europe, including Britain. No absolute guarantee of that is possible, of course. And if that supply is interrupted, then what.

This is what I&#039;ve been banging on about for some time now: Britain cannot, and will not, sustain our present profligate average lifestyle.

In fact, it&#039;s much worse than that. There&#039;s a real and apparently undodgeable threat now growing slowly but inexorably that we will be unable just to feed and supply with other absolute necessaries the huge overpopulation that Britain now houses - just.

Even if these spare essentials were available on world markets, how exactly is Britain to pay for them, at any price, let alone at the prices that will be standard as surpluses vanish worldwide?

There appears to be barely any awareness of this danger, outside a miniscule [sic] percentage of serious realists following the output of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.theoildrum.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Oil Drum&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.postcarbon.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Post Carbon Institute&lt;/A&gt;, and similar uncompromising clear-seers; nor any will at all to look at things realistically, and to begin to think about practical responses, amongst the whole Brit populace; certainly not amongst the simply hopeless gic/City-serving [gangsters-in-charge] political class. The pocket-pols [politicians-in-the-pockets-of-private-enterprise] seem to have no other idea at all beyond side-kicking for US imperialism, and seem quite unable to grasp that that huge global murder and extortion racket is now in its twilight.

I often feel comforted these days that I have connections in the west of Eire [Ireland], and thus have the possibility of me and mine decamping to relatives there, if things get bad enough here. As they well might. Eire could feed itself from its own resources, assuming rapid and intelligent adoption of permacultural and forest-permacultural approaches; Britain couldn&#039;t, though, even then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodbye it is, Jo. There is in fact NO strategy, no mix of energy sources, no financial or economic policy which will maintain the current, simply unsustainable level of energy use in Britain; even if Russia turns out, in the event, to be a reliable medium-term supplier of natural gas to Europe, including Britain. No absolute guarantee of that is possible, of course. And if that supply is interrupted, then what.</p>
<p>This is what I&#8217;ve been banging on about for some time now: Britain cannot, and will not, sustain our present profligate average lifestyle.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s much worse than that. There&#8217;s a real and apparently undodgeable threat now growing slowly but inexorably that we will be unable just to feed and supply with other absolute necessaries the huge overpopulation that Britain now houses &#8211; just.</p>
<p>Even if these spare essentials were available on world markets, how exactly is Britain to pay for them, at any price, let alone at the prices that will be standard as surpluses vanish worldwide?</p>
<p>There appears to be barely any awareness of this danger, outside a miniscule [sic] percentage of serious realists following the output of <a HREF="http://www.theoildrum.com/" rel="nofollow">The Oil Drum</a>, <a HREF="http://www.postcarbon.org/" rel="nofollow">Post Carbon Institute</a>, and similar uncompromising clear-seers; nor any will at all to look at things realistically, and to begin to think about practical responses, amongst the whole Brit populace; certainly not amongst the simply hopeless gic/City-serving [gangsters-in-charge] political class. The pocket-pols [politicians-in-the-pockets-of-private-enterprise] seem to have no other idea at all beyond side-kicking for US imperialism, and seem quite unable to grasp that that huge global murder and extortion racket is now in its twilight.</p>
<p>I often feel comforted these days that I have connections in the west of Eire [Ireland], and thus have the possibility of me and mine decamping to relatives there, if things get bad enough here. As they well might. Eire could feed itself from its own resources, assuming rapid and intelligent adoption of permacultural and forest-permacultural approaches; Britain couldn&#8217;t, though, even then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on George Monbiot&#8217;s Parochial Frame by martyn</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/george-monbiots-parochial-frame/comment-page-1/#comment-125493</link>
		<dc:creator>martyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12825#comment-125493</guid>
		<description>I agree Jo. It&#039;s not a popular slogan on the left for obvious reasons, but we are all in this together. We need policies that get &quot;middle class&quot; savings out of bank accounts and invested in low carbon as well as policies that help those who cannot afford to improve their homes to do so.

I also don&#039;t get why Government bonds are good but FITs bad. Both involve people with money handing it over for good works and receiving a return at some point down the line. The anti FITs brigade are either disingenuous or focussed on completely the wrong target - bonds and PFI are massively bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Jo. It&#8217;s not a popular slogan on the left for obvious reasons, but we are all in this together. We need policies that get &#8220;middle class&#8221; savings out of bank accounts and invested in low carbon as well as policies that help those who cannot afford to improve their homes to do so.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t get why Government bonds are good but FITs bad. Both involve people with money handing it over for good works and receiving a return at some point down the line. The anti FITs brigade are either disingenuous or focussed on completely the wrong target &#8211; bonds and PFI are massively bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wind Powers #1 : Civitas Fictitious ? by Arthur Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/12/wind-powers-1-civitas-fictitious/comment-page-1/#comment-125230</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12737#comment-125230</guid>
		<description>I see from your post that you think Ruth Lea the author of the Civitas report is biased. Does this mean that the report is factually incorrect, if so which facts are incorrect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see from your post that you think Ruth Lea the author of the Civitas report is biased. Does this mean that the report is factually incorrect, if so which facts are incorrect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Last Battle by Steven Earl Salmony</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/15/the-last-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-124749</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Earl Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12749#comment-124749</guid>
		<description>Scientists are abjectly failing to come to terms with uncontested scientific research of human population dynamics that indicates with remarkable simplicity and clarity how the population dynamics of the human species is essentially similar to the population dynamics of other species; that food is the primary causative agent of the population growth of species everywhere, including the human species. This single point continues to be discounted and all but denied. This is not to say that other factors are not present or influential. Human pollution, waste products, dissipation of Earth’s resources and degradation of its environs are also factors.
 
We must come to a new, widely shared and consensually validated understanding about a single biological question: In the relationship between food and human population numbers which one is the dependent variable and which is the independent variable? Outdated, inadequately researched &#039;scientific&#039; evidence has been broadcast ubiquitously during my lifetime. All that pseudoscientific research indicates that food is the dependent variable and human population numbers is the independent variable; that human beings grow food to meet the needs of a growing population. Perhaps this commonplace and conventional understanding of the relationship is upside down. Please consider that food is the independent variable and human population numbers is the dependent variable; that the recent, astonishing increase in the food supply for human consumption is causing the skyrocketing growth of absolute global human populations numbers on our watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists are abjectly failing to come to terms with uncontested scientific research of human population dynamics that indicates with remarkable simplicity and clarity how the population dynamics of the human species is essentially similar to the population dynamics of other species; that food is the primary causative agent of the population growth of species everywhere, including the human species. This single point continues to be discounted and all but denied. This is not to say that other factors are not present or influential. Human pollution, waste products, dissipation of Earth’s resources and degradation of its environs are also factors.</p>
<p>We must come to a new, widely shared and consensually validated understanding about a single biological question: In the relationship between food and human population numbers which one is the dependent variable and which is the independent variable? Outdated, inadequately researched &#8216;scientific&#8217; evidence has been broadcast ubiquitously during my lifetime. All that pseudoscientific research indicates that food is the dependent variable and human population numbers is the independent variable; that human beings grow food to meet the needs of a growing population. Perhaps this commonplace and conventional understanding of the relationship is upside down. Please consider that food is the independent variable and human population numbers is the dependent variable; that the recent, astonishing increase in the food supply for human consumption is causing the skyrocketing growth of absolute global human populations numbers on our watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wind Powers #1 : Civitas Fictitious ? by Rae</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/12/wind-powers-1-civitas-fictitious/comment-page-1/#comment-124703</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12737#comment-124703</guid>
		<description>As well as the potential bias in those involved, the methods used in the study by Dr Kees le Pair are quite unrealistic. The variability of wind is obtained from data from a single point wind speed record so it ignores the smoothing effect obtained by wind farms distributed throughout a country. Then the effect of a varying load on generation appears to be based again on a model of how a single power station might operate, rather than on how a complete power system might behave.
Not much use really.
http://www.clepair.net/windSchiphol.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As well as the potential bias in those involved, the methods used in the study by Dr Kees le Pair are quite unrealistic. The variability of wind is obtained from data from a single point wind speed record so it ignores the smoothing effect obtained by wind farms distributed throughout a country. Then the effect of a varying load on generation appears to be based again on a model of how a single power station might operate, rather than on how a complete power system might behave.<br />
Not much use really.<br />
<a href="http://www.clepair.net/windSchiphol.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.clepair.net/windSchiphol.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

