-
James Delingpole : Recycling Silliness
Posted on March 6th, 2010 1 commentI think somebody should take James Delingpole quietly to one side and have a little word in his ear about the ineptitude of recycling silly stories :-
“What Dave and his chum Barack don’t want you to know about green jobs and green energy : By James Delingpole Politics : March 6th, 2010 : Green jobs are a waste of space, a waste of money, a lie, a chimera. You know that. I know that. We’re familiar with the report by Dr Gabriel Calzada Alvarez of the Rey Juan Carlos University in Spain which shows that for every “green job” that is created another 2.2 jobs are LOST in the real economy…”
Here Mr Delingpole, you are on the shakiest of grounds from my point of view. Your writing suggests that in the field of Energy Engineering you have even less knowledge about the technological and economic data than you do about Climate Change Science, and what you have acquired is apparently deeply misinformed. With only the briefest of Google searches, you could have discovered what the Huffington Post uncovered on 2nd May 2009 :-
-
Green Energy : Stuck in the Sidings
Posted on March 5th, 2010 1 commentIf you can imagine the engine for new, renewable and sustainable Energy systems as a train which should by now be thundering down the tracks, get this : it left the depot only to get stuck in the sidings.
Enough of the locomotive metaphors, already. On to the analysis. Here’s an excerpt from Catherine Mitchell’s fine book “The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy” (2008, 2010) :-
Big Picture, British Sea Power, Carbon Capture, Climate Change, Cost Effective, Energy Revival, Nuclear Nuisance, Nuclear Shambles, Pet Peeves, Political Nightmare, Regulatory Ultimatum, Social Change, Technological Sideshow, Vote Loser, Wind of Fortune Atomic Energy, Atomic Power, Climate Change, Energy infrastructure, Energy Investment, Energy systems, Global Warming, New Nuclear, Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Renewable Energy, Sustainable Energy -
Fossil Fuels Ruel, OK ?
Posted on February 11th, 2010 2 commentshttp://www.polluterharmony.com/
It’s easy to stay on top of the heap – just throw rocks at everybody trying to climb The Hill.
Fossil Fuels are free when they come out of the ground, but exact a heavy price on the Environment – a cost that cannot be measured in Money – since wealth is made from Fossil Fuel Energy.
Unless we cut the thread – the causal relationship between Energy use and Carbon Dioxide emissions – then we will all lose wealth – from the destruction of the natural environment.
The only practical answer is to reduce the amount of Fossil Fuel that is burned. But that would impoverish us. So we need to have Zero Carbon Energy to replace Fossil Fuel Energy.
Renewable Energy is the only source of future wealth.
-
Do Hold Your Breath
Posted on January 27th, 2010 No commentsIf I had a eurocent for every time a Climate Change denier-sceptic told me that if I really, truly believe that Carbon Dioxide causes Global Warming I should just stop breathing…well, I’d be rich enough now to afford to buy the whole of Belgium, or at least most of economically-depressed Wallonia. Mmm…Waffles.
But seriously, holding your breath in the form of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) is one of the big flashing signs for the future of ReSmoothing, smoothing Renewable Energy supply, that is.
Big Picture, Energy Revival, Peak Oil, Pet Peeves, Renewable Resource, Wind of Fortune CAES, Compressed Air Energy Storage, Energy, engineer, engineering, Flow Batteries, Flow Battery, Fuel Cell, Hydroelectricity, Hydropower, PHES, Pumped Hydro Energy Storage, Pumped Storage, Renewable, Renewable Energy, Storage, underground -
Dominic Lawson : Sussex Farmhouse
Posted on January 12th, 2010 No commentsOnce again, Dominic Lawson fails to realise that many of his readers will simply not connect with him :-
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/dominic_lawson/article6982310.ece
Only a very marginally low proportion of the British population can identify with, or only hope to aspire to, his perilous predicament.
Stuck down a snowy country lane and running out of heating oil ? Look, mate, you can afford to live in a “Sussex farmhouse”. Isn’t it about time you took your finger out and wrote a fat cheque to get connected to the gas mains ?
-
British Sea Power Supergrid
Posted on January 3rd, 2010 No comments“Supergrid”. Sounds a bit 1986-ish, really. But it could save Europe from industrial collapse as Carbon restrictions start to bite.
“Sun, wind and wave-powered: Europe unites to build renewable energy ’supergrid’ : North Sea countries plan vast clean energy project : €30bn scheme could offer weather-proof supply : Alok Jha : guardian.co.uk : Sunday 3 January 2010″
-
OPEC Compensation
Posted on November 27th, 2009 No commentsYou can bet your bottom petrodollar that there will be some bailouts at Copenhagen.
There will be the obvious benefactors, in the form of the Mitigation and Adaptation Fund, which will be set up to get money flowing from the industrialised countries to the developing countries, to enable the developing countries to buy technologies from the industrialised countries, to save the developing countries from Global Warming.
But behind the headlines, there will be some other deals being cut, in fact, one in particular may already have been sliced, judging by this article (OPEC = Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries) :-
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6926219.ece
-
Wind Turbines Give You Spots (3)
Posted on November 26th, 2009 No commentsI haven’t noticed any of the major medical agencies coming out with statements of their own regarding Nina Pierpoint’s theories about the health disbenefits of wind turbines. That rather leads me to suspect there’s not much to this supposed problem that she documents :-
-
Some People Never Change
Posted on November 19th, 2009 1 commentSo I’m talking to some people and someone says that people don’t care about the fact they’re wasting Energy, that people just don’t think.
Even though they know about Global Warming and the risks of dangerous Climate Change, and they know about the connection between burning Fossil Fuels and Global Warming, they just don’t care about how much Energy they’re using.
And I know this is heresy to say so, but I said that people shouldn’t have to think about Energy, that they shouldn’t be made to feel guilty about using Energy. I said that the Energy that is provided to them should be Carbon-free and responsibility-free. People shouldn’t be forced to act against their nature. Energy is effectively free at the moment. It’s way cheap, even cheaper than food for a lot of people. So people use it. People love using Energy.
-
Wind Power : Superior Variability
Posted on August 17th, 2009 1 commentImage Copyleft : Jo Abbess
The security of energy supply depends on a number of factors. These days it’s important to make sure we in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are on good speaking terms with both Saudi Arabia and Russia to be sure of the flow of Crude Petroleum Oil and Natural Gas. Oh, and Norway, of course, since our own (Scotland’s) North Sea treasures are in steep decline.
-
Wind Turbines Give You Apoplexy
Posted on August 4th, 2009 No commentsReactions to the article “Wind Turbines Give You Spots” is encouraging, if contentious. Looks like we’ve mined a thick vein of dispute. Could a simple, happy, smiley Public Relations campaign to promote Wind Power counter this ? I think not !
-
Wind Turbines Give You Spots
Posted on August 3rd, 2009 9 commentsI don’t know whether to laugh or shed tears in comic agony at this, which looks like the latest in a very long line of environmental “hoaxes”.
A person allegedly a paediatrician from New York claims to have diagnosed a new disorder, with a wide range of symptoms, relating to Wind Turbines.
Provisionally named “Wind Turbine Syndrome”, this “visceral vibratory vestibular disturbance” can be detected in folks unlucky enough to be living within the spinning shadow of new wind farms.
-
Eleven Practical Ideas to Combat Climate Change
Posted on February 14th, 2005 No commentsVery little of what follows is original thought. But after much reflection, I feel these ideas are worthy of attention, and so I have expanded them for your consideration.
1. Contraction & Convergence Video Conferencing
Yet another international meeting on Energy Efficiency, Climate Change, Renewable Energy. Yet another brace of airline tickets for big speakers, engineers, policy-makers and scientists (and reporters) to fly in and confer.
In order to demonstrate the Contraction & Convergence framework in action, the delegates at all these meetings and conferences should reduce their carbon emissions to be in line with the lowest emitter of them all. Everyone will contract their carbon emissions, and everyone will get in line. Equal rights to pollute. The Principle of Equity.
There is enough cable and wire laid under all the world’s oceans and through the world’s rivers and soils to hold every single meeting by videoconferencing. And so it should be done.
No more flying for people of green persuasions. Follow Aubrey Meyer of the Global Commons Institute and the UNFCCC papers for development of Contraction & Convergence.




