<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jo Abbess &#187; Peak Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joabbess.com/category/peak-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joabbess.com</link>
	<description>Energy Change for Climate Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Living Life and LOAFing It</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/02/05/living-life-and-loafing-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/02/05/living-life-and-loafing-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advancing Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertise Freely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alchemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Kingdoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bee Prepared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behaviour Changeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction of Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droughtbowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eating & Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Howzat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faithful God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feel Gooder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forestkillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemarketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freshwater Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Muddyfixation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geogingerneering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth Paradigm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Impacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Carbon Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvellous Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudge & Budge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigm Shapeshifter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Deferment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Sideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technomess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tree Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ungreen Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtually Vegan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHRISTIAN ECOLOGY LINK PRESS RELEASE Living Life and LOAFing It &#8211; Green Christians ask churches to &#8220;Use your LOAF !&#8221; on sourcing sustainable food In the run up to Easter, Christian Ecology Link is asking supporters to think and act on how they source food for their church communities, with the aim of reducing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/resources/loaf"><IMG SRC="http://www.changecollege.org.uk/img/Tim_Harberd_Local_Free_Range_Eggs_and_Homeground_Flour.jpg" WIDTH="400" /></A></TD><TD><B>CHRISTIAN ECOLOGY LINK</B><br />
<B>PRESS RELEASE</B></p>
<p><B>Living Life and LOAFing It &#8211; Green Christians ask churches to &#8220;Use your LOAF !&#8221; on sourcing sustainable food</B></p>
<p>In the run up to Easter, Christian Ecology Link is asking supporters to think and act on how they source food for their church communities, with the aim of reducing the impact of unsustainable agriculture on their local area, and the wider world.<br />
</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2">CEL have launched a <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/loafUseYourLoaf.pdf">new colour leaflet on the LOAF programme principles</A> in time for Shrove Tuesday (Mardi Gras), or Pancake Day, on 21st February 2012.</p>
<p>The key LOAF principles are that food should where possible be sourced Locally, grown and reared Organically, be Animal-friendly and Fairly traded.</p>
<p>There is an <A HREF="http://www.christian-ecology.org.uk/loaf-letter.doc">action letter</A> that can be downloaded from the website, urging church leaders to adopt the LOAF principles at community facilities.</p>
<p>CEL&#8217;s Web Editor Judith Allinson said, &#8220;We hope that our members and friends will take the opportunity to join in sending a letter to their church leaders asking that their community LOAF during Lent, and then carry on LOAFing throughout the following year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Green Christians are being encouraged to order free copies of the new LOAF leaflet to distribute during Fair Trade Fortnight, which runs from 27th February to 11th March 2012, by sending an e-mail to : <A HREF="mailto:jill-publications@christian-ecology.org.uk">jill-publications@christian-ecology.org.uk</A></p>
<p>The new all-colour leaflet can also be downloaded from : <A HREF="http://www.christian-ecology.org.uk/use-your-loaf.pdf">http://www.christian-ecology.org.uk/use-your-loaf.pdf</A> or <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/loafUseYourLoaf.pdf">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/loafUseYourLoaf.pdf</A></p>
<p>CEL members and friends are being asked to submit LOAF-themed recipes which will be uploaded to the new website : <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/archives/category/food/recipes">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/archives/category/food/recipes</A></p>
<p>CEL&#8217;s Secretary, Barbara Echlin said, &#8220;Start the LOAF ball rolling in your own church by serving pancakes on Shrove Tuesday and make them with local free range eggs, organic milk and Fair Trade sugar. Ample food for all !&#8221;</p>
<p>Guidance for LOAF campaigners includes the suggestion to send the campaign letter to local church leaders and regional church administrators; and asking cathedrals, conference centres, educational venues and large churches with a refectory or cafe to take part.</p>
<p>CEL&#8217;s Information and Analysis Officer, Jo Abbess said &#8220;Good food is holy food &#8211; and good food comes from well-treated plants, animals and workers too. It&#8217;s not enough to choose organic over intensively-farmed &#8211; we need to choose co-operative food growers over convenience store profits.&#8221;</p>
<p>ENDS</p>
<p>NOTES FOR EDITORS</p>
<p>1.  The LOAF principles were developed several years ago by Christian Ecology Link, and the new all-colour leaflet has been produced to accompany the launch of a letter-writing campaign &#8211; asking leaders and managers of all Christian venues to &#8220;Use their LOAF !&#8221;</p>
<p>2.  LOAF stands for : Locally produced, Organically grown, Animal friendly, Fairly traded.</p>
<p>3.  The full text of the LOAF letter is below. Members and supporters are asked to modify it as they wish, or print it as it is from the website.</p>
<p><HR><br />
<HR></p>
<p>Dear</p>
<p>As a supporter of Christian Ecology Link (CEL), I feel that many present aspects of food production imperil the wellbeing of Creation. This is why I am writing to tell you about CEL&#8217;s food campaign &#8211; LOAF &#8211; and to ask you to consider following these guidelines.</p>
<p>CEL is asking churches, cathedrals, districts, diocese offices, and Christian holiday, retreat and conference centres, schools and colleges to try to source food which is :-</p>
<p>*  Locally produced</p>
<p>Supporting local and national farmers and producers strengthens local economies and communities, and lowers carbon emissions. We need to combat the nonsensical policy of importing food which could be, and indeed is, grown and produced here only for export.</p>
<p>*  Organically grown</p>
<p>Subsidised industrialisation of agriculture leads to severe biodiversity losses, to soil depletion, water pollution and agrochemical resistance. Organic farming is key to the recovery of interdependent ecosystems. Supporting organic production is also central to the struggle against GM biotechnology, which poses threats to other crops (via cross-pollination) and biodiversity.</p>
<p>*  Animal friendly</p>
<p>UK animal welfare standards are higher than many countries. But shops still sell produce from hens caged, beak-trimmed and bred for unnaturally fast growth rates; pigs confined to barren sheds, teeth clipped and tails docked, many pregnant sows in farrowing crates; turkeys in dark, dirty sheds where they develop lameness and burns. The wellbeing of animals is entrusted to us. Will you consider sourcing only free-range eggs and free-range, organic or outdoor reared meat ? Also, a shift to a much higher proportion of vegetarian/vegan cooking is also vital as meat and dairy production requires far more land and water and is responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>*  Fairly traded</p>
<p>In a world where trade justice seems to recede and trade policies assist large producers rather than small producers, a commitment to serve only Fairtrade tea and coffee, for example, would signal support for the one certification guaranteeing minimum remuneration and community investment.</p>
<p>I feel that we are called to renew, heal and restore God&#8217;s creation: an immense commission only to be realised by infinitesimal everyday acts &#8211; in His grace.</p>
<p>Please find enclosed CEL&#8217;s new LOAF leaflet. More may be downloaded free from : http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/resources/loaf</p>
<p>I look forward to your response.</p>
<p>Yours</p>
<p><HR><br />
<HR></p>
<p></TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/02/05/living-life-and-loafing-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Detox 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/carbon-detox-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/carbon-detox-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertise Freely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assets not Liabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Be Prepared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behaviour Changeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burning Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraction & Convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction of Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eating & Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency is King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faithful God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feel Gooder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gamechanger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Carbon Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvellous Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudge & Budge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigm Shapeshifter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stirring Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Power of Intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voluntary Behaviour Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wasted Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PRESS RELEASE Carbon Detox 2012 : Shed Unwanted Pounds With Our Unique Formulation George Marshall, well-known sustainable living guru, will be asking us to challenge ourselves, our routines and bad habits, and make a 2012 all-year resolution to shed the excess carbon from our lives. On 21st January 2012 at a convenient central London location, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><A HREF="http://climatedenial.org/2011/01/10/the-ingenious-ways-we-avoid-believing-in-climate-change-a-video-presentation/"><IMG SRC="http://climatedenial.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/climatedenial/2011/01/D2C1674-cropped.jpg" WIDTH="400" /></A></TD><TD>PRESS RELEASE</p>
<p><B>Carbon Detox 2012 : Shed Unwanted Pounds With Our Unique Formulation</B></p>
<p>George Marshall, well-known sustainable living guru, will be asking us to challenge ourselves, our routines and bad habits, and make a 2012 all-year resolution to shed the excess carbon from our lives.</p>
<p>On 21st January 2012 at a convenient central London location, he will ask us to take action to get control of our personal energy, and add vitality to our lives with new aims and goals.</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2">The aim of the event is to help us acquire the psychological tools we need to lead slimmer, healthier and more ethically satisfying lifestyles.</p>
<p>Speaking from the experience gained from his decades of research and practice in the field, and giving tips and tricks from his bestseller &#8220;<A HREF="http://www.carbondetox.org/">Carbon Detox</A>&#8220;, George will be guiding us expertly through the carbon counting maze.</p>
<p>One of our leaner life activities group said : &#8220;Cutting down has been hard work, but has become much more fun now I am involved in my local group. I am looking forward to meeting my buddies on Saturday.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tony Emerson, the coordinator for the ecocell 2 programme said : &#8220;In three years our household has managed to halve the amount of greenhouse gases we produce &#8211; by topping up loft insulation, converting to double glazing, installing a wood stove and learning how to best use it, new heavier curtains, wall insulation, changing to a green electricity supplier, continued monitoring of timings and temperature of the central heating – and of course taking part in the ecocell 2 programme. However we still have further to go and I am looking forward to hear what George Marshall has to say. One way we are encouraging people in ecocell 2 is to have a buddy system, whereby people pair up, or group up, by phone, so that people with similar houses can support each other.&#8221;</p>
<p>To register for this free, all day event, including a selection of facilitated workshops and to receive your take-home worksheet pack, please email Tony at <A HREF="mailto:ecocell@christian-ecology.org.uk">ecocell@christian-ecology.org.uk</A></p>
<p>For photographs of the day&#8217;s events, and feedback from the workshops, please contact Jo on 0845 45 98 46 0</p>
<p>ENDS</p>
<p><HR></p>
<p>NOTES FOR EDITORS</p>
<p>a.   Climate change activist and author George Marshall will be addressing green Christians during an all-day conference on Saturday 21st January 2012 in Central London.</p>
<p>b.   The Christian Ecology Link ecocell project team will facilitate workshops on &#8220;living the truly sustainable life&#8221; at the Magdalen Centre, St Mary&#8217;s Church, Eversholt Street near Euston train station between 10.00 am and 5.00 pm [1]</p>
<p>c.   George Marshall, author of the easy-to-read book &#8220;Carbon Detox : Your step-by-step guide to getting real about climate change&#8221; will be offering his fact-packed and lighthearted insights into action on climate change, drawn from his experience of over a decade of community and policy work. [2]</p>
<p>d.   The event will be suitable for anybody already taking part in the ecocell project, or anybody interested in starting. The workshops on the day will be pitched at several levels.</p>
<p>e.   The ecocell-1 workshop group will look at the introductory programme to help your family or church group take their first steps to reducing their impact on the environment. [3]</p>
<p>f.   The ecocell-2 workshop will look at the more in-depth project, to provide mutual support for those who want to reduce their carbon emissions to sustainable levels within five years. [4]</p>
<p>REFERENCES</p>
<p>[1] The Magdalen Centre, St Mary’s Church, Eversholt Street, London NW1 1BN is located about 7 minutes&#8217; walk north of Euston train station.</p>
<p>[2] <A HREF="http://www.carbondetox.org/">http://www.carbondetox.org/</A></p>
<p>[3] <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell-1">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell-1</A></p>
<p>[4] <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell-2">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell-2</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell2-materials">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/ecocell/ecocell2-materials</A></p>
<p>[5] <A HREF="http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/archives/1537">http://www.greenchristian.org.uk/archives/1537</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.christian-ecology.org.uk/ecocell-day-21-jan-2012.htm">http://www.christian-ecology.org.uk/ecocell-day-21-jan-2012.htm</A></p>
<p>CONTACT</p>
<p>For details of Christian Ecology Link, please phone Jo on 0845 45 98 46 0 or email <A HREF="mailto:info@christian-ecology.org.uk">info@christian-ecology.org.uk</A></p>
<p></TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/19/carbon-detox-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/15/the-last-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/15/the-last-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babykillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divide & Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamworld Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droughtbowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eating & Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faithful God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financiers of the Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floodstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemarketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incalculable Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neverending Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Blood For Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not In My Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigm Shapeshifter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace not War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wasted Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Statue of Liberty&#8221; or Saint John&#8217;s Lamb of God ?Britain&#8217;s real enemy is not Iran. The real enemy is the mismanagement of the Earth&#8217;s energy resources. The last battle is to overcome the misdeeds of those who have commandeered and wasted the Earth&#8217;s energy resources &#8211; and that includes ourselves. It should not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><A HREF="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Apollo1.JPG/500px-Apollo1.JPG"><IMG SRC="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-apl91VEHHDw/Tu-P0QXKbQI/AAAAAAAABXA/WxE9LKZVpNI/s400/Statue+Of+Liberty+Monochrome+Wallpaper.jpg" WIDTH="400" /></A></p>
<p><P CLASS="small">The &#8220;Statue of Liberty&#8221; or Saint John&#8217;s Lamb of God ?</P></TD><TD>Britain&#8217;s real enemy is <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/15/iran-could-face-uk-military-action">not Iran</A>. </p>
<p>The real enemy is the mismanagement of the Earth&#8217;s energy resources. </p>
<p>The last battle is to overcome the misdeeds of those who have commandeered and wasted the Earth&#8217;s energy resources &#8211; and that includes ourselves.</p>
<p>It should not be a violent dispute, for aggression and the use of weapons are morally unjustifiable. But all the same, it will be a genuine, Titanic, struggle.</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2">As C. S. Lewis <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Battle">portrays with so much resonance</A>, it matters little under which flag or title we serve or belong &#8211; what matters is our <A HREF="http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/30911-the-taarkan-spoiler-alert">allegiance to the precepts of divine honour</A>, holy devotion and right dealings with other people :-</p>
<p>&#8220;Why did the faithful Taarkan end up getting to come into Narnia ? Usually Lewis writes allegorically so is he trying to tell us something when a worshipper of Tash is allowed to enter the new Narnia ? Any thoughts ? &#8230;It wasn&#8217;t the name that mattered, but rather the conduct of the Taarkan and how he chose to see and do things. He didn&#8217;t believe in the cruelty and underhanded ways his countryman were doing things, but rather in honour and a code of conduct. So even though the Taarkan thought he was worshipping Tash, the whole time he was actually worshipping Aslan [Turkish for "Lion"] through his thoughts and deeds. So when the time came for the end of the world and judgement, he was placed where his heart had always led him.&#8221; </p>
<p>For those who recognise the twin threats from climate change and energy depletion, we realise that there is hard work ahead. Our natural aim is to protect ourselves; and the moral consequence is that we are obliged to protect the other &#8211; because both climate change and energy depletion are global problems.</p>
<p>Climate change hits the poorest the hardest &#8211; already, significant changes in rainfall and weather patterns have created long-term drought, encroaching coastal and inland inundation, crop losses and enforced migration. And it&#8217;s only going to get worse. It&#8217;s so terrible we could not even wish it on our enemies &#8211; it teaches us that nobody is an enemy.</p>
<p>To solve climate change, we need to change our energy systems. Some hail the depletion of hydrocarbon and coal energy resources as a gift that will help us resolve the emissions problem and prevent dangerous climate change, by making a virtue of necessity &#8211; but the situation is not that simple.</p>
<p>The reaction of the world&#8217;s authorities, wealth controllers and corporate proprietors to the winding down of fossil fuel energy resources has so far been complex, and there are many indications that warfare, both military and economic, has been conducted in order to secure access to energy.</p>
<p>This may be the way of the lion in us all, but it is not the way of The Lamb. The Lamb sacrifices all that others value so that he is qualified to bring about a new universal regime of peace and responsible autonomy &#8211; a kingdom of priests, pastors with mutual respect. </p>
<p>We are called to become good stewards of each other and the Earth. The gentle Lamb of God will judge our hearts.</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+4&#038;version=CEV">The Book of the Revelation to Saint John the Divine, Chapter 4</A> :-</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;I looked and saw a door that opened into heaven. Then the voice that had spoken to me at first and that sounded like a trumpet said, &#8220;Come up here ! I will show you what must happen next.&#8221; Right then the Spirit took control of me, and there in heaven I saw a throne and someone sitting on it. The one who was sitting there sparkled like precious stones of jasper and carnelian. A rainbow that looked like an emerald surrounded the throne. Twenty-four other thrones were in a circle around that throne. And on each of these thrones there was an elder dressed in white clothes and wearing a gold crown. Flashes of lightning and roars of thunder came out from the throne in the center of the circle. Seven torches, which are the seven spirits of God, were burning in front of the throne. Also in front of the throne was something that looked like a glass sea, clear as crystal&#8230;And as they worshiped the one who lives forever, they placed their crowns in front of the throne and said, &#8220;Our Lord and God, you are worthy to receive glory, honour, and power. You created all things, and by your decision [and for your pleasure] they are and were created&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+5&#038;version=CEV">The Book of the Revelation to Saint John the Devine, Chapter 5</A></p>
<p>&#8220;In the right hand of the one sitting on the throne I saw a scroll that had writing on the inside and on the outside. And it was sealed in seven places. I saw a mighty angel ask with a loud voice, &#8220;Who is worthy to open the scroll and break its seals ?&#8221; No one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or see inside it. I cried hard because no one was found worthy to open the scroll or see inside it. Then one of the elders said to me, &#8220;Stop crying and look ! The one who is called both the `Lion from the Tribe of Judah&#8217; and `King David&#8217;s Great Descendant&#8217; has won the victory. He will open the book and its seven seals.&#8221; Then I looked and saw a Lamb standing in the center of the throne&#8230;The Lamb looked as if it had once been killed. It had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God, sent out to all the earth. The Lamb went over and took the scroll from the right hand of the one who sat on the throne. After he had taken it, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders knelt down before him. Each of them had a harp and a gold bowl full of incense, which are the prayers of God&#8217;s people. Then they sang a new song, &#8220;You are worthy to receive the scroll and open its seals, because you were killed. And with your own blood you bought for God people from every tribe, language, nation, and race. You let them become kings and serve God as priests, and they will rule on earth.&#8221;"</p>
<p><B>Leaders of the powerful nations &#8211; put aside your <A HREF="http://www.challengingdestiny.com/reviews/doorocean.htm">death-hastening technology</A>.</p>
<p>Let there be a low carbon energy peace on a climate-stable Earth.</B></p>
<p><HR></p>
<p>Additional Readings</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%203:7-9&#038;version=NIV">http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%203:7-9&#038;version=NIV</A></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Understand, then, that those who have faith are children of Abraham. Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles [non-Jewish people] by faith, and announced the gospel [good news of God's love and forgiveness] in advance to Abraham: “All nations will be blessed through you.” So those who rely on faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%203:26-29&#038;version=NIV">http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%203:26-29&#038;version=NIV</A></p>
<p>&#8220;So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized [ritual bathing] into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile [non-Jewish person], neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.&#8221;</p>
<p><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_Thou_My_Vision">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_Thou_My_Vision</A></p>
<p>&#8220;Thy love in my soul and in my heart -<br />
Grant this to me, O King of the seven heavens.</p>
<p>O King of the seven heavens grant me this -<br />
Thy love to be in my heart and in my soul.&#8221;</p>
<p><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Spirits_of_God">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Spirits_of_God</A></p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://stainedglasscanada.ca/gallery/143/images/st_andrews_chapel_usk__(6).JPG" WIDTH="400" /></p>
<p><B>[ UPDATE : No, I have not taken leave of any of my senses. I was in church, All Saints in Highams Park, London E4, and many thoughts arose as I contemplated the <A HREF="http://seax.essexcc.gov.uk/result_details.asp?DocID=900323">stained glass window</A>, with its Suffering Servant Messenger King/Lord/Master, rainbow, Alpha, Omega, Noah's dove with the sprig of olive; and listened to the reading from Revelations 4; and sang "Be Thou My Vision" with the congregation; and considered what Epiphany the world needs at this time of intense war propaganda. There are those who declare themselves as Christian who claim that <A HREF="http://www.newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul106.htm">war with Iran is prophesied</A>. This may be a fringe view, but <A HREF="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2007246,00.html">the narrative</A> infects major political discussion in the United States of America : "The problem, of course, is that rhetoric can have political effects that narrow the options available to decisionmakers. If you've publicly declared Iran's nuclear program sufficiently threatening to warrant initiating a potentially catastrophic war and then sanctions fail to achieve their defined goal, you may have a hard time walking back from that threat." ]</B></p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.stainedglasscanada.ca/gallery/205/images/st_hed_cath__(11).JPG" WIDTH="400" /></p>
<p></TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/15/the-last-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Powers #1 : Civitas Fictitious ?</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/12/wind-powers-1-civitas-fictitious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/12/wind-powers-1-civitas-fictitious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assets not Liabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bait & Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay and Deny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divide & Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamworld Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency is King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financiers of the Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freak Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth Paradigm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimistic Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradigm Shapeshifter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Deferment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unqualified Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind of Fortune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ An extract from the online Christian Ecology Link discussion forum : 11th January 2012 ] The Civitas report on wind farms. A couple of days ago, Civitas published a report entitled, &#8220;Electricity costs: the folly of wind-power&#8221; : http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/prleaelectricityprices.htm [ Download report PDF ] This report was produced by the Civitas economist, Ruth Lea. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[ An extract from the online Christian Ecology Link discussion forum : 11th January 2012 ]</p>
<p>The Civitas report on wind farms.</p>
<p>A couple of days ago, Civitas published a report entitled, &#8220;Electricity costs: the folly of wind-power&#8221; : <A HREF="http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/prleaelectricityprices.htm">http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/prleaelectricityprices.htm</A> [ Download report <A HREF="http://www.civitas.org.uk/economy/electricitycosts2012.pdf">PDF</A> ]</p>
<p>This report was produced by the Civitas economist, <A HREF="http://www.global-vision.net/ourteam.asp">Ruth Lea</A>. The report attracted a <A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/9000760/Wind-power-is-expensive-and-ineffective-at-cutting-CO2-say-Civitas.html">fair</A> <A HREF="http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2012/01/09/civitas-think-tank-s-report-blasts-wind-power-as-a-costly-folly-91466-30089721/">bit</A> of <A HREF="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2012/01/benefits-wind-power-questioned/47146/">publicity</A> and even more <A HREF="http://www.bwea.com/media/news/articles/pr20120109.html">antagonism</A> from those <A HREF="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2135974/renewableuk-slams-civitas-wind-power-report-inaccurate-outdated">within</A> the <A HREF="http://www.greenwisebusiness.co.uk/news/thinktank-civitas-blasted-over-flawed-wind-power-report-2943.aspx">renewables</A> <A HREF="http://www.evwind.es/noticias.php?id_not=15750">industry</A>. Sadly, as usual <A HREF="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/01/08/wind-farms-useless-carbon-emissions-civitas-think-tank_n_1192495.html?ref=uk&#038;ref=uk">the media</A> have done rather <A HREF="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084046/Wind-power-does-value-money-unreliable-requires-gas-stations.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">less research than they should have</A>; in particular they failed to check the background of the authorities quoted, though the Guardian did point to <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2012/jan/09/wind-turbines-increasing-carbon-emissions">Lea&#8217;s views on climate change</A>.</p>
<p>The following YouTube link leads to Ruth Lea denying the significance of anthropogenic climate change and the &#8216;flaws&#8217; in Britain&#8217;s expensive climate change legislation. She uses all the same sad old errors and, in so doing, limits her credibility as an effective researcher : <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvmgUYGgqwU">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvmgUYGgqwU</A> <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcFfxUIRbyo">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcFfxUIRbyo</A></p>
<p>Her comments seem to be straight out of the Chicago School mythology that economics overrides nature &#8211; the view of many scientifically illiterates. </p>
<p>But it gets better, she quotes, as an authority, Dr Kees le Pair, but fails to mention that he is a member of the &#8216;Committee of Recommendation&#8217; of the Fusion Energy Foundation. The development of nuclear fusion, if it happens, will require very significant investment, investment that could, perhaps, otherwise be made in wind farms and other renewables so there is an important conflict of interest that has been wholly ignored : <A HREF="http://www.fusionenergyfoundation.org/about-us">http://www.fusionenergyfoundation.org/about-us</A></p>
<p>This matters to all of us because it shows the dangerous level of uncritical evaluation that is made of so called scientific reports and information sources. I still remember the days past when research involved trips to libraries and hours of reading and, unless, the library had an academic connection, new information would not have been easily available. </p>
<p>Perhaps it was the more difficult nature of research that made the media, and much of its audience, that much more careful. The advent of the Internet has provided for rapid transmission of information, straight to your computer or even your smartphone, but apparently at the cost of critical evaluation. So much information is available that even report writers seem to fail to check the background of their sources or the veracity of the information given by that source. Yet, that same Internet provides the means of checking and it&#8217;s far less tedious than back in the days of library visits.</p>
<p>Careful use of a search engine can throw up evidence of partiality and YouTube can often confirm background beliefs that have overridden scientific evidence if not common sense. It&#8217;s not just<br />
in reports such as this one from Civitas but also within so many anti this, that and the other environmental groups that plague the Internet.</p>
<p>Look carefully at Occupy, for example, and dig deeply enough, you will find some truly amazing YouTube material on the way in which the City of London is a part of worldwide Zionism that is somehow linked with the Vatican and Knights Templar ! Did you know that the Bank of England is owned by the Rothschilds ? The Internet, as well as giving freer voice to information also gives voice to conspiracy theorists and to the murk of prejudice. Just as it is both wrong and dangerous to spread unfounded rumours so it is to spread disinformation, so please use your search engine, take a little time and then critically assess whether this information that you have been given is likely to be both accurate and honest. </p>
<p>RT </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2012/01/12/wind-powers-1-civitas-fictitious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Heap : Panoramic Nonsensity</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/17/tom-heap-panoramic-nonsensity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/17/tom-heap-panoramic-nonsensity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advancing Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Be Prepared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burning Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Taxatious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal Breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay and Deny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction of Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disturbing Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divide & Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financiers of the Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemarketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Singeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hide the Incline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimistic Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrolheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Ultimatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Deferment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technofix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technomess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Loser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: 9 November 2011 From: tim b To: jo abbess Hi Jo, Just picked up on your blog following leads on Tom Heap &#8211; I&#8217;m writing a piece for my website (www.biggreenbang.co.uk) on the panorama / KPMG saga &#8211; just wanted to say what a great blog it is~!! Don&#8217;t find so many to-the-point sites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: 9 November 2011<br />
From: tim b<br />
To: jo abbess</p>
<p>Hi Jo,</p>
<p>Just picked up on your blog following leads on <A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/panorama/hi/front_page/newsid_9631000/9631864.stm">Tom Heap</A> &#8211; I&#8217;m writing a piece for my website (<A HREF="http://www.biggreenbang.co.uk">www.biggreenbang.co.uk</A>) on the <A HREF="http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/panorama-provides-narrow-view-rising-fuel-bills-20111108">panorama</A> / <A HREF="http://www.oilpubs.com/oso/article.asp?v1=11388">KPMG</A> saga &#8211; just wanted to say <A HREF="http://www.joabbess.com">what a great blog it is~!!</A> Don&#8217;t find so many to-the-point sites in the UK &#8211; have picked up on guys like <A HREF="http://thinkprogress.org/romm/issue/">Joe Romm in the States</A> but you seem to have your finger right on the pulse in the UK!</p>
<p>&#8230;Should explain that my site has been initiated by a load of IT techie nerds who are already working in telecoms and are about to launch a zero carbon mobile phone company (by a combination of using low carbon technology, buying into renewable power and carbon offsetting) They are committed to putting part of their profits into green projects and are setting up <A HREF="http://www.biggreenbang.co.uk">BGB</A> in the hopes that it will be a vehicle for making sustainability issues available to a wider public &#8211; they have ambitions to develop it as a community resource too &#8211; They obviously hope to get spin-off business for their mobile phone network but I believe their motives are genuinely good and they seem to be giving me a fairly free rein!</p>
<p>look forward to hearing from you</p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 10 November 2011<br />
From: jo abbess<br />
To: tim b</p>
<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>Good luck with the Panorama research.</p>
<p>Another person to follow on this is <A HREF="http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=NzQwMg==">Christian Hunt</A> at <A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org">Carbon Brief</A> :-</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/looking-into-panoramas-sources">http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/looking-into-panoramas-sources</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/kpmg-not-sure-if-written-report">http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/kpmg-not-sure-if-written-report</A><br />
<A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/another-correction-from-the-mail-group-on-energy-bills">http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/another-correction-from-the-mail-group-on-energy-bills</A></p>
<p>&#8230;Keep the green flag flying !</p>
<p><span id="more-12147"></span>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 11 November 2011<br />
From: tim b<br />
To: jo abbess</p>
<p>Hi Jo,</p>
<p>Thanks for getting back,</p>
<p>I would like to send you a link to the article but for some strange reason its not been published yet &#8211; not so much research on Panorama as a general review of Knowns and Unknowns that a report based on figures from and unpublished draught press release throws up!! &#8211; It was a <A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/11/looking-into-panoramas-sources">Carbon Brief</A> piece that made me take the tack i took.</p>
<p>What I was really interested in was the cut of Tom Heap&#8217;s jib &#8211; I picked up on your site because I Googled his name &#8211; and lo and behold you critiqued the Beeb&#8217;s Climategate coverage saying, “some of the mistakes made by the reporter, Tom Heap, were laughable”.</p>
<p>My deeply sceptical mind started to wonder &#8211; especially given his Countryfile role, if he&#8217;s not one of the &#8220;farmer boy climate sceptics&#8221; (living in rural XXXXXXXXX with lots of Telegraph reading Hooray Henrys &#8211; I meet lots of them!) That is pure speculation on my part but even if it&#8217;s just a case of a young ambitious journalist trying to make a name for himself (and aware that good sceptic record will be a great career move for anyone wanting to work for Murdoch, The Mail, The Express&#8230; its a long and tragic list!) &#8211; he&#8217;s hardly generous with information!</p>
<p>&#8230;We are still sticking the nuts and bolts of the site together at the moment &#8211; my responsibility is writing relevant stories &#8211; and my background in environmental issues goes right back to the early days of the Sullom Voe oil terminal in the Shetland Islands (1970&#8242;s) I&#8217;ve been immersed in this stuff most of my adult life &#8211; starting out as a &#8220;back to the land idealistic greeny&#8221; and ending up a cynical old man &#8211; but still believing that this is the most improtant issue we have ever faced!</p>
<p>best wishes </p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 11 November 2011<br />
From: jo abbess<br />
To: tim b</p>
<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t grow old and cynical. Instead, grow wise and excited about the prospects for positive change.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t be your generation that fixes climate change with renewable energy, sustainable agriculture and a steady-state economy. It won&#8217;t be my generation, either &#8211; I&#8217;m older than many of the &#8220;senior&#8221; figures in the UK Government.</p>
<p>We owe it to the next generations to share our hope, knowledge and encouragement; and believe in them. </p>
<p>Scotland will have wind and marine power to replace the oil and gas economic compromise with the English. Wales and Ireland can become energy-independent and shake off Westminster. There will be more sanity, more loft insulation and peace.</p>
<p>I would suggest caution in trusting the BBC for energy news. The BBC people that actually know anything about energy appear to be sidelined by those rolling with the &#8220;national interest&#8221; programme, supporting UK energy companies and their tainted arguments; not realising that it&#8217;s in the interests of the energy business to transition out of carbon. I am looking forward to work by <A HREF="http://www.fairpensions.org.uk/">Fair Pensions</A> and other organisations on how companies, and banks, can only survive by investing in renewable energy.</p>
<p>&#8230;Stay in touch,</p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 15 November 2011<br />
From: tim b<br />
To: jo abbess</p>
<p>Hi Jo,</p>
<p>Fear not &#8211; Old and Cynical is a bit of a pose &#8211; having reached 60 this year I feel entitled to a degree of curmudgeonlyness &#8211; I am indeed excited by the positives, but I&#8217;m aware of the extent of change that is needed and the scale of resistance. I suppose the old cynical bit comes from an acute awareness of the political trickery and media manipulation being used by the energy industry in particular &#8211; The <A HREF="http://thegwpf.org/uk-news/4279-saving-britains-economy-ditch-expensive-wind-farms.html">ST</A>/<A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/nov/08/energy-bills-panorama-renewables">Panorama</A> <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2011/nov/09/energy-bills-panorama">thing</A> is a case in point &#8211; they&#8217;ve sucessfully run a well publicised negative story with a headline figure of £34 billion savings on a report that still (as far as I know today) remains unpublished. The manipulation of media, astroturfing and funding of front organisations in the USA by the likes of <A HREF="http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Americans_for_Prosperity">Koch</A> and <A HREF="http://www.exxonsecrets.org">Exxon</A> has led to a political fantasy world over there &#8211; with climate denial held as orthodoxy by the right. There&#8217;s evidence this ultra neo-con agenda is  influential in the current [UK] government.</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/oct/15/liam-fox-atlantic-bridge">Liam Fox&#8217;s Atlantic Bridge charity</A> had close ties with <A HREF="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/10/atlantic-bridge-and-the-climate-skeptics">ALEC</A> &#8211; a well funded influence peddling machine that gets its money from similar sources &#8211; (check out <A HREF="http://alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed">ALEC Exposed</A> for a bit more insight) &#8211; two of its trustees <A HREF="http://www.stephennewton.com/atlantic-bridge-american-legislative-exchange-council/">[William] Hague</A> and <A HREF="http://paulflynnmp.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/11/atlantic-bridge-too-big-to-hound.html?cid=6a00d8346d963f69e2015392e110c8970b">George Osborne</A> (and especially Osborne) are leaders of the climate denial lobby within the Cabinet (Osborne&#8217;s father-in-law &#8211; is <A HREF="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/05/18/plum-job-for-father-in-law-of-osborne-115875-22266482/">David Howell</A> &#8211; and he&#8217;s apparently a prominent Climate Change denier). The gulf between the Government&#8217;s promises on carbon targets etc and its actions is growing at a rate &#8211; and it doesn&#8217;t seem beyond the realms of possibility that a beleaguered David Cameron would offer a withdrawal of support for renewables against a get out of jail card on Europe. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the Panorama report is deliberate manipulation &#8211; but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a possibility that should be ruled out. The technique of &#8220;reporting&#8221; on unpublished reports has popped up a few times this year &#8211; if memory serves me correctly the [Daily] Mail ran a whole load of spurious headlines on the costs of the new Electricity Reform Bill on pure speculation.</p>
<p>So yes, agreed that we have to be positive and hopeful &#8211; but feel we have to keep an eye and a voice on the &#8220;rich old white men&#8221; who seem to be determined to use no holds barred dirty tricks to stop a move towards a decarbonised world &#8211; as for it being future generations that will be the ones who change things &#8211; well The [International Energy Agency] IEA are saying we have <A HREF="http://www.ww4report.com/node/10533">5 years to get on top of carbon emissions</A> &#8211; not a body exactly renowned for making provocative extravagant claims. One of the things they highlight is that future carbon consumption is locked in by the investments we make today &#8211; build a coal power plant and we&#8217;re locked into burning coal for the next 40 years etc &#8211; I&#8217;m sure you are a aware of these issues as I am &#8211; so I feel I have to disagree about leaving it to younger generations &#8211; we are all in this together and my year old grandson has no voice &#8211; I have to speak for him!</p>
<p>Good grief &#8211; all this stuff sounds terribly like a conspiracy theory &#8211; I&#8217;ve fought against believing it but the evidence train is so strong that it has to be taken seriously </p>
<p>best wishes</p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 15 November<br />
From: jo abbess<br />
To: tim b</p>
<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>As Cameron says, &#8220;calm down, dear&#8221;. You&#8217;re not a conspiracy theorist &#8211; you&#8217;re just doing some critical thinking.</p>
<p>It is now clear that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change will be ineffectual in delivering a workable carbon treaty. The International Energy Agency and the US Energy Information Administration are powerless. The G20 Governments are incompetent. Carbon taxation and carbon trading are dead in the water &#8211; because they are based on faulty economics. The Climate Finance Fund for mitigation and adaptation will be as poorly funded as the international aid programmes. Deforestation will continue apace.</p>
<p>Stupid old white men do not have an evil agenda &#8211; they seriously believe they are doing the right thing (especially if it ups their share price). However, they do have an agenda &#8211; business as usual &#8211; and this does need to be critiqued.</p>
<p>There is no prospect of &#8220;business as usual&#8221; for a number of reasons &#8211; Peak Oil being one of them. We could discuss different opinions about the causes of Peak Oil for several weeks, but the data is in. The &#8220;business as usual&#8221; approach to tackling Peak Oil is a ramshackle plan to drill more, in more places, including the Arctic; to do Coal-to-liquids, Gas-to-liquids projects; to try to coax algae to produce biodiesel, a whole range of ethanol and methanol projects. All of these will fail. Where was the Arctic physically during the Permian ? Paleogeography indicates there&#8217;s not much oil in the Arctic. Algae breed messily and slowly. Coal is also peaking. Gas is going to peak in 2030 &#8211; 2035.</p>
<p>The problem with these problems is that most people are not paid to see them, or they are paid not to see them, which is why you have the climate change denial lobby, and the renewable energy rubbishing lobby.</p>
<p>My view on these matters is that there is no evil, just incompetence. And this needs to be continually shown to the light with sanity and clarity.</p>
<p>Keep on at it (and do keep in touch &#8211; although I rarely enter into lengthy correspondence),</p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
<p>Date: 15 November 2011<br />
From: jo abbess<br />
To: tim b</p>
<p>Hi Jo</p>
<p>&#8230;should emphasise that I don&#8217;t believe the evidence points to a conspiracy theory. Rather the opposite &#8211; its so strong it&#8217;s clearly not a conspiracy theory. A year ago I would have thought the notion that corporate power in the [United] States was systematically funding the stuff it funds ridiculous &#8211; now I feel a bit silly not knowing it was going on!</p>
<p>As for &#8220;not being evil&#8221; &#8211; Well I guess that depends how evil is defined &#8211; in my demonology spreading deliberate lies in order to knowingly pursue a path that will cause harm to others ranks fairly high on &#8220;the things I would define as evil&#8221; scale. Pursuing a course that gives a favourable balance sheet but putting the global eco-system at risk definitely justifies the tag! Having said that, I&#8217;m not concerned with moral judgements so much as trying to explore ways of getting a broader mass of people to recognise the biggest obstacle to the kind of paradigm shifts we need to make are political rather than technological &#8211; it&#8217;s as if we are fighting against a Goebbels style propaganda campaign but no one even knows its happening. I suppose part of the point of <A HREF="www.biggreenbang.co.uk">BGB</A> is to try and introduce these notions to the &#8220;wanna be green by means of farmers markets and good recycling&#8221; to the harder nosed side of the issues in as gentle way as possible.</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/17/tom-heap-panoramic-nonsensity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Capture and Syngas</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/16/carbon-capture-and-syngas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/16/carbon-capture-and-syngas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bait & Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemarketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geogingerneering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrogen Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realistic Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource Wards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technofix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unnatural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wasted Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1970s they were expecting global cooling &#8211; of the economy. There were oil shocks and shocking prices, and petrochemists beavered away, sweating over test tubes the size of football fields, whisking up synthetic fuels. It was not the first time that the world had tried to synthesise liquid vehicle fuel. Hitler famously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><A HREF="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2180rank.html"><IMG SRC="http://www.changecollege.org.uk/img/World_Gas_Production_Projection.png" WIDTH="650" /></A></p>
<p>Back in the 1970s they were expecting global cooling &#8211; of the economy. There were oil shocks and shocking prices, and petrochemists beavered away, sweating over test tubes the size of football fields, whisking up synthetic fuels.</p>
<p>It was not the first time that the world had tried to synthesise liquid vehicle fuel. Hitler famously did it during the Second World War, and had it not been for Bergius and Fischer-Tropsch, Nazi Germany would have collapsed much sooner under the anvil of global economic sanctions. I mean, the history books insist the multi-pronged military assault was responsible for the Victory in Europe, but the final push would never have succeeded without the suspension of energy trade.</p>
<p>Various syngas and synfuel projects have continued in various places, mostly America, and although the first plants used coal and Natural Gas to make other things, these days the emphasis is on biomass.</p>
<p>We can expect to see a dramatic rise in the amount of Biogas and Bio-syngas produced over the next few decades, along with renewably-sourced hydrogen. It will all get fed into the global syngas refineries, and out will pop power, vehicle fuel and chemistry.</p>
<p><span id="more-12115"></span>But as soon as Natural Gas peaks, and tighter gases like Shale Gas with it, we can expect to see pressure on geoengineering projects to run in reverse. You see, carbon-rich gases are essential for the operation of bio-refineries, and so it will pay to collect the waste gases from any power station. And if those gases have been stuffed underground, we can expect people to want to extract them again.</p>
<p>So, the oil, gas and coal companies have been pressuring governments, central banks and international bodies for funds to do Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) projects. And we&#8217;ve fallen for it &#8211; offering bailout money to the energy companies to allow them to continue to burn coal and capture the carbon and store it somewhere.</p>
<p>And then, in twenty or twenty-five years time, the oil, gas and coal companies will come back for public funding to extract the carbon dioxide out of the ground again, so that they can give us all &#8211; no, sell us all &#8211; lots of synthetic fuels, because the petroleum fossil oil will be significantly depleted by then.</p>
<p>Yet another reason not to publicly fund CCS, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/16/carbon-capture-and-syngas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar FIT to Bust #5</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/15/solar-fit-to-bust-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/15/solar-fit-to-bust-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babykillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Be Prepared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Sea Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Effective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay and Deny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction of Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geogingerneering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incalculable Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Blood For Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not In My Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Nuisance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Shambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace not War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrolheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Ultimatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource Curse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource Wards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Sunrise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Deferment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technofix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Sideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Power of Intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport of Delight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unnatural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany can do it, but not the British. The Collected Republic of the People can install solar power with great will and nerve, but not Johnny English. Let&#8217;s be clear here &#8211; the people in Scotland have a vision for future Renewable Energy, and so do many people in Wales and Ireland, but it appears [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><iframe width="400" height="300" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0tb7HLk9QlM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></TD><TD>Germany can do it, but not the British. The <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_Germany">Collected Republic</A> of <A HREF="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Dutch&#038;allowed_in_frame=0">the People</A> can install solar power with great will and nerve, but not Johnny English.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be clear here &#8211; the people in Scotland have a vision for future Renewable Energy, and so do many people in Wales and Ireland, but it appears English governance listens to fuddy duddy landowners too readily, and remains wedded to the fossil fuel industry and major construction projects like nuclear power, and carbon capture and storage.</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2">What precisely is wrong with the heads of policy travel in Westminster ? Do they not understand the inevitable future of &#8220;conventional&#8221; energy &#8211; of decline, decimation and fall ?</p>
<p>It really is of no use <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/nov/15/nuclear-renewables-schellnhuber">putting off investment in truly sustainable and renewable power and gas</A>. There are only two paths we can take in the next few decades, and their destination is the same.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it goes. Path A will take the United Kingdom into continued dodgy skirmishes in the Middle East and North Africa. Oil production will dance like a man with a stubbed toe, but then show its true gradient of decline. Once everybody gets over the panic of the impending lack of vehicle fuel, and the failure of alternatives like algal biodiesel, and the impacts of a vastly contracted liquid fuel supply on globalised trade, then we shall move on to the second phase &#8211; the exploitation of gas. At first, it will be Natural Gas. But that too will decline. And then it will be truly natural gases. As gas is exploited for vehicles, electricity will have to come from coal. But coal, too, is suffering a precipitous decline. So renewable energy will be our salvation. By the year 2100, the world will run on renewable electricity and renewable gas, or not at all.</p>
<p><span id="more-12104"></span>Meanwhile we will have had wars, rumours of wars, and just plain bomb-dropping, and lots of ancient civilisations will have bit the uranium-laced dust, and Scotland will have long since made a break for economic and political freedom. And we will have locked ourselves into dangerous climate change through our wanton burning of fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Path B &#8211; the logical long-term option and where we&#8217;re headed anyway &#8211; is to bypass climate change, bypass warfare and bypass idiocy and go straight to renewables. </p>
<p>But can the English Government work this out ? Can they see beyond their Cost Benefit Analyses and their short-termism and the calls to cut regulation and targets ? Can they imagine what life will be like in 30 years &#8211; and can they be made to be accountable to the future citizens of this country ?</p>
<p>We need to stimulate the development of renewable energy in the United Kingdom. It will take tax breaks, direct funding, subsidies. The Feed-in Tariff for solar power is essential in the current economic environment, to build a long-lasting electricity generation asset. If the British Government truly takes the prosperity of this country seriously, they need to plan for a significant deployment of renewable energy. We don&#8217;t know what the price of fossil fuels will be in five years time, ten years time. But we know that sunshine will always be free.</TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/15/solar-fit-to-bust-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Gas : Balanced Power</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/05/renewable-gas-balanced-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/05/renewable-gas-balanced-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bait & Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Sea Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay and Deny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction of Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divide & Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drive Train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrificandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Howzat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feel Gooder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financiers of the Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gamechanger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrocarbon Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrogen Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvellous Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methane Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not In My Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Nuisance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Shambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimistic Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Ultimatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource Wards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Sunrise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stirring Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Power of Intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport of Delight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind of Fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who know very little about renewable and sustainable energy continue to buzz like flies in the popular media. They don&#8217;t believe wind power economics can work. They don&#8217;t believe solar power can provide a genuine contribution to grid capacity. They don&#8217;t think marine power can achieve. They would rather have nuclear power. They would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><A HREF="http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/biorefinery.html"><IMG SRC="http://www.changecollege.org.uk/img/Renewable_Gas_Refinery_and_Generation.png" WIDTH="650" /></A></p>
<p>People who know very little about renewable and sustainable energy continue to buzz like flies in the popular media. They don&#8217;t believe wind power economics can work. They don&#8217;t believe solar power can provide a genuine contribution to grid capacity. They don&#8217;t think marine power can achieve. They would rather have nuclear power. They would rather have environmentally-destructive new oil and gas drilling. They have friends and influence in Government. They have financial clout that enables them to keep disseminating their inaccuracies.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to ditch the pundits, innuendo artists and insinuators and consult the engineers.</p>
<p>Renewable Gas can stand in the gap &#8211; when the wind doesn&#8217;t blow or the sun doesn&#8217;t shine and the grid is not sufficiently widespread and interconnected enough to be able to call on other wind or solar elsewhere.</p>
<p>Renewable Gas is the storing of biologically-derived and renewably-created gases, and the improving of the gases, so that they can be used on-demand in a number of applications.</p>
<p>This field of chemical engineering is so old, yet so new, it doesn&#8217;t have a fixed language yet. </p>
<p>However, the basic chemistry, apart from dealing with contaminants, is very straight-forward.</p>
<p>When demand for grid electricity is low, renewable electricity can be used to make renewable hydrogen, from water via electrolysis, and in other ways. Underused grid capacity can also be used to methanate carbon-rich biologically-derived gas feedstocks &#8211; raising its stored energy.</p>
<p>Then when demand for grid electricity is high, renewable gas can be used to generate power, to fill the gap. And the flue gases from this combustion can be fed back into the gas storage.</p>
<p>Renewable gas can also be biorefined into vehicle fuels and other useful chemicals. This application is likely to be the most important in the short term.</p>
<p>In the medium-term, the power generation balance that renewable gas can offer is likely to be the most important application.</p>
<p>Researchers are working on optimising all aspects of renewable gas and biorefinery, and businesses are already starting to push towards production.</p>
<p>We can have a fully renewable energy future, and we will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/05/renewable-gas-balanced-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Soon Is Now ?</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/04/how-soon-is-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/04/how-soon-is-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimistic Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace not War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Sunrise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hedge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind of Fortune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=12005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With almost daily updates on the climate change and energy crises, it seems like we should convert all our power generation and fuel systems to renewable resources. As of yesterday. It would seem that sooner rather than later is the best timeframe for any adjustment and renovation of energy systems. The current debate in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><A HREF="http://gigaom.com/cleantech/pros-cons-distributed-rooftop-solar-vs-desert-solar-thermal/"><IMG SRC="http://earth2tech.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/cudrefin_switzerlandashx.jpeg?w=480&#038;h=326" WIDTH="400" /></A></TD><TD></p>
<p>With almost daily updates on the climate change and energy crises, it seems like we should convert all our power generation and fuel systems to renewable resources. As of yesterday. </p>
<p>It would seem that sooner rather than later is the best timeframe for any adjustment and renovation of energy systems. </p>
<p></TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2"></p>
<p>The current debate in the United Kingdom about state subsidies to solar photovoltaic electricity generation systems is strongly focused on financial aspects, but really should be centred on pragmatism.</p>
<p>Privatisation of electricity generation has resulted in decades of under-investment. Many power stations and grid components needs updating or replacing. This needs to be done soon, as the Regulator Ofgem has reported in their &#8220;Project Discovery&#8221;.</p>
<p>With such a short time to renew electricity generation, it would seem wise to adopt both a top-down and bottom-up approach, by investing in a range of electricity production systems of all scales.</p>
<p>Yet there is a remarkable intransigence in the power industry. Those players with the access to credit and the capital that have the capacity to invest in new installations are simply not budging. </p>
<p><span id="more-12005"></span>Despite the UK Government&#8217;s keen interest in nuclear power, as far as I know there is only one serious reactor build project in motion.</p>
<p>The one remaining project in the demonstration competition for Carbon Capture and Storage has effectively lodged itself into a hole in the ground and probably won&#8217;t come out to play for a while until it gets a fistful of new European money.</p>
<p>Despite a clutch of new gas-fired power stations on the &#8220;to do&#8221; list of approved plans, only a couple are envisaged to roll out in the next few years.</p>
<p>What is going on ?</p>
<p>Well, this was partly revealed by the end of the Radio 4 &#8220;File on 4&#8243; programme, aired on 4th October 2011, &#8220;Energy prices&#8221; :-</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b015ck9v">http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b015ck9v</A></p>
<p><A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/04_10_11_fo4_energy.pdf">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/04_10_11_fo4_energy.pdf</A></p>
<p>Gerry NORTHAM: &#8220;The Government is upbeat about its chances of transforming the industry. But despite the current talk of drastic measures to shake up the Big Six, we&#8217;ve found a sense of caution about the likelihood of radical reform. They are, after all, the same Big Six the Government will need to renew and green-up most of the generating infrastructure at a cost of £200 billion by OFGEM&#8217;s estimate. David Porter, the electricity industry spokesman, believes it&#8217;s time for some very frank talking.&#8221;</p>
<p>David PORTER: &#8220;Whether £200 billion can be raised is a huge question. There are serious doubts about whether that money will be forthcoming and it&#8217;s absolutely clear that it can&#8217;t come just from six companies. We have a number of other generating businesses in our association that also want to invest in this industry, and they have big plans, but the Government&#8217;s role in this is absolutely critical, because unless public policy for our industry is clear and stable, this money will not be forthcoming. And that means that we put at risk the replacement of ageing power stations and we certainly put at risk the transition that we&#8217;re beginning to see towards a low carbon power industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>NORTHAM: &#8220;It sounds almost as if you&#8217;re saying that your industry has got the Government over a barrel, because the Government needs the electricity infrastructure to be updated, and if it wants that it&#8217;s got to pretty much play ball with the companies you represent.&#8221;</p>
<p>PORTER: &#8220;Well, there has to be a good working relationship between an industry which is as important as ours and the Government of the day.&#8221;</p>
<p>NORTHAM: &#8220;Are you effectively saying to the Government, you interfere with the way we run our business at your peril?&#8221;</p>
<p>PORTER: It&#8217;s not quite like that, but Government should unders …&#8221;</p>
<p>NORTHAM: &#8220;Not quite?&#8221;</p>
<p>PORTER: &#8220;No, Government should understand that public policy decisions about our industry have to be taken very carefully.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Electricity Market Reform is making proposals for a &#8220;carbon price floor&#8221; amongst other things, which could result in heavy penalties on high-carbon generation. Despite producing less emissions than coal burning, a carbon price will definitely eat into profits for those burning Natural Gas for generation. And Natural Gas is the fuel that is most frequently used to burn to generate electricity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not easy to turn a whole industry around overnight, and so carbon pricing is not going to do anything apart from raise Government tax revenues. Having a new charge for carbon won&#8217;t help companies invest in new lower carbon generation. They cannot ditch their high carbon assets and build new low carbon facilities at the flick of this policy switch. And with extra charges, they will have less profits to put towards new investment. It is likely that the carbon revenues will be committed to highly expensive developments like new nuclear power and Carbon Capture and Storage, two technologies that may have already hit a dead end because of the disruption in the global economy. And Fukushima Dai-ichi. And the cost of the carbon price will inevitably be felt by the energy end consumer as energy companies scramble to offset its impact on their balance sheets.</p>
<p>The wholesale prices of coal, oil and Natural Gas will remain strong, so electricity generation, in particular, stands the risk of squeezing the margins of profit for generation companies. They will continue to avoid new investment without Government support. But it appears that Government support will all be going towards the most difficult projects.</p>
<p>The energy companies appear to be playing a game of brinkmanship. If the Government can blink first over carbon pricing, then the energy companies can feel safe to survive. </p>
<p>The Government is openly criticising the energy companies for raising retail prices of energy, and the regulator will pursue allegations of &#8220;tacit collusion&#8221; in the sector.</p>
<p>If carbon pricing is pushed home, and the companies cannot defend their ability to make profits from sales, then there is little prospect of seeing new energy investment in the UK for another decade.</p>
<p>So, the British will end up paying more for their energy, and the country won&#8217;t see any new low carbon energy investment.</p>
<p>The two things that were apparently able to buck the trend were the development of large scale wind power and small scale solar power. But the NIMBYs have resisted profitable onshore wind power. And now the Government is pulling the rug out from underneath the fledgling household solar industry, with a fast and deep cut in the feed-in tariff, that was designed to create incentives for wide deployment.</p>
<p>The Department of Energy and Climate Change is considering massive payouts to promote new nuclear power, whilst still shouldering the burden of the disposal of the last fifty years of radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry.</p>
<p>The money would be far better spent on rooftop solar, despite the high latitude of the country. This is because it can be done now. Today. We don&#8217;t need to wait any longer to increase the amount of low carbon generation in the United Kingdom. We can build wind farms and install domestic solar power.</p>
<p>I would rather that my taxes went to pay for small scale solar power and incentives for large wind farms, than pay for weaponry to kill people and destroy countries in the Middle East and North Africa, where most of the world&#8217;s remaining oil and gas are.</p>
<p></TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/11/04/how-soon-is-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The European Union Question #2</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/10/25/the-european-union-question-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/10/25/the-european-union-question-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal Breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demoticratica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disturbing Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divide & Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossilised Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth Paradigm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landslide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Sings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrolheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest & Survive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Ultimatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stirring Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Deferment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Loser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=11833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image Credit : Debbie PortwoodUnbelievably, yesterday, people in the British Government sacrificed their careers rather than vote with David Cameron&#8217;s three line whip against a Referendum on the UK&#8217;s membership of the European Union. I say &#8220;unbelievably&#8221;, but I know full well why it happened. Democracy is broken in Britain, and there is every reason [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><TABLE><TR><TD><A HREF="http://fineartamerica.com/featured/1-vote-for-me-ii-debbie-portwood.html"><IMG SRC="http://www.changecollege.org.uk/img/Debbie_Portwood_Vote_for_Me_2.jpg" WIDTH="400" /></A></p>
<p><A HREF="http://fineartamerica.com/featured/1-vote-for-me-ii-debbie-portwood.html"><P CLASS="small">Image Credit : Debbie Portwood</P></A></TD><TD>Unbelievably, yesterday, people in the British Government sacrificed their careers rather than vote with David Cameron&#8217;s three line whip against a Referendum on the UK&#8217;s membership of the European Union. I say &#8220;unbelievably&#8221;, but I know full well why it happened. Democracy is broken in Britain, and there is every reason to point the finger of blame and accusation at the media, for their continued massacre of the issues in political debate. They should be observers and reporters; but instead they are influencers and arbiters.</TD></TR><TR><TD COLSPAN="2"></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it goes : the Daily Mail, to take just one example, raises the outrage level, and repeats arguments that have little substance. People act on the basis of what they read in the papers and see on TV, and they develop poor reasoning, and do things like sign an ePetition. The thing gets publicly debated, partly in the media of course. And then finally the democratic representatives, the Members of Parliament, have to make a choice to stand with the stirred-up outrage or instead, vote with sanity. </p>
<p>A vote on Europe would be a disaster. The wording would be over-simplistic and hide the true agenda. It would be too easy to sway people to vote for the worst option.</p>
<p><span id="more-11833"></span>Remember the Referendum on the Alternative Vote ? It was the only thing that could have broken the stranglehold of First-Past-the-Post politics. Instead, seats are going to stay safe &#8211; the party that holds an area&#8217;s vote will continue to take the vote. Democratic contests cannot happen in safe Constituencies, particularly if the boundary lines are changed to fit the demographics. The First-Past-the-Post system in easy-to-hold political wards &#8211; that&#8217;s one way in which democracy has been killed. If a seat is safe, no will in the world can create a political debate in a Constituency.</p>
<p>But why did people vote against the Alternative Vote ? Because of the media-assisted rubbishing of the idea. </p>
<p>David Cameron makes the point that a third of the population, if asked, would ditch the United Kingdom&#8217;s membership of the European Union. They would have very little foundation for doing so, but they would vote for it, just like they demanded weekly refuse collections, and immigration controls, and an 80 miles an hour speed limit, because the newspapers and the television and the radio told them to.</p>
<p>The people have been manipulated, so democracy doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Every mechanism for enabling democracy appears to have withered away.</p>
<p>Campaign organisations and charities are usually given the task of convincing the public to vote with their ethics, with knowledge and with empathy. But with the recession, grants have dried up, so there are not the funds, the staff or the resources to get good things done.</p>
<p>Demonstrations and protests and marches are routinely blacked out of media presentations of political activity.</p>
<p>Writing letters to your democratic representative can be like shouting into an empty well.</p>
<p>Signing online petitions is useless. Signing real petitions is doubly useless.</p>
<p>What forums do people have to debate issues with real information at their fingertips ? What channels do groups of well-informed citizens have to take their well-considered and researched demands to their democratic representatives in sufficient strength to justify their MPs taking the issues on to the Parliament and raising them in the House (of Commons) ?</p>
<p>What ways can citizens use to do politics in their local town ? With Councillors bowled over with insane levels of trivia, can they be expected to engage with genuine informed citizen concerns ?</p>
<p>The news is awash with some inexplicable language :-</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/86398,news-comment,news-politics,eu-debate-exposes-camerons-cack-handed-leadership-">http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/86398,news-comment,news-politics,eu-debate-exposes-camerons-cack-handed-leadership-</A><br />
&#8220;The eurozone crisis may eventually call for a new treaty, and in that case a referendum is already a legal requirement. It would make sense at that moment to repatriate powers to Britain.&#8221;</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2053011/EU-referendum-David-Cameron-shows-strain-biggest-Tory-mutiny-Europe.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2053011/EU-referendum-David-Cameron-shows-strain-biggest-Tory-mutiny-Europe.html</A><br />
&#8220;&#8216;We&#8217;re not going away&#8217; say rebels as PM insists UK will have to wait years to claw back powers from Brussels&#8221;</p>
<p>What sovereign powers are these people talking about ? </p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15425256">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15425256</A><br />
&#8220;Education Secretary Michael Gove insisted on Tuesday that the time was not right for a referendum to take place. He told the BBC: &#8220;The most important thing is to make sure we get powers back, so we take more decisions here about employment, about growth, about jobs. These are critical issues. &#8220;At the moment David Cameron is battling in Europe in order to make sure that we can have those decisions taken here. It may be that in the future as a result of the battle David Cameron is fighting for Britain that a referendum may be needed, but my judgement is that we need to get those powers back.&#8221;"</p>
<p>What on Earth could he possibly mean ? Employment Law ? The right for businesses to make everybody into serfs by increasing working hours at will, reducing wages at will, and demanding high flexibility of the workfoce ? Or maybe Human Rights ? Denying people their human rights so they can be deported or put in inhumane private prisons ? </p>
<p>The right to abandon renewable energy targets, just when we need to seriously develop sustainable power as the North Sea oil and gas are in firm decline ? The right to abandon environmental regulation ? The right to set taxes too low for the rich and too high for the poor ? The right to deny people a living wage and a roof over their head because they can&#8217;t work, because there are no jobs for them to slave away at ?</p>
<p>Is it all about banking, then ? Or industrial policy ? I seriously don&#8217;t know what Michael Gove&#8217;s real agenda is, but I suspect it has something to do with continuing with the neoliberal privatisation agenda &#8211; putting all social goods into private hands for profit.</p>
<p>What has Europe ever done for us ? Britain&#8217;s involvement in the European Union project has been right at the centre, in agreeing excellent labour law, human rights, technological performance, business accountability, renewable energy. The European project is a British project. Why would anybody want to leave ?</p>
<p>In my humble view, the Conservative Party should expel the Eurosceptic rebels. They do no good to the Coalition Government, and they offer no progress in democratic advancement.</p>
<p>And, I would suggest, the Conservative Party ask the media to inject some reality and pragmatism into their presentation of European Union issues. It&#8217;s not the 1970s or the 1980s any more, Mr Newspaper Editor. Like it or not, the European Common Market and its safety and success are in the British national interest.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re never going to solve environmental problems like climate change without working hand-in-hand with Europe. And we are definitely not going to address the energy crisis without staying in the Common Market.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for David Cameron to ditch the dinosaurs.</TD></TR></TABLE></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joabbess.com/2011/10/25/the-european-union-question-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

