Psy Ops Gone Wrong


I’m not a conspiracy theorist, even though what I’m about to summarise may sound like I wear a tinfoil hat and don’t use wi-fi, but I assure you this is not true.

I would like you to consider the proposition that disbelief in climate change science is nothing more than an exercise in public mind-bending gone very, very wrong.

In the 1970s, climate change science began to accumulate some serious evidence and intelligent students. It became clear to a number of powerful players that the policy implications of global warming included a drastic reassessment of oil and gas dependence in the global economy.

Defence and national governance institutions all over the Free World, but most significantly in the United States of America, began to discuss the security implications of policy to combat global warming. The energy companies realised that the game was up if they didn’t act – they had their business profits to lose if carbon dioxide emissions became regulated.

Academics and researchers such as Naomi Oreskes and James Hoggan have documented what happened as a result – connivance from the oil, gas and coal companies to launch public relations exercises to qualm apocalyptic fear amongst the general population.

Certain scientists and engineers in the pay of the energy sector, and also close to the American federal administration, and some even in the US Department of Defense, took it as their personal mission to undermine confidence in climate change science, using tried-and-tested techniques from the public relations industry, sowing doubt in science.

Universities were targets for this psychological operation – the early versions of the Internet were ideal pathways for communicating the disinformation. Even very intelligent people became suspicious of climate change science, using the same route by which some environmentalists were invited to become suspicious of microwave ovens – but that’s a whole other story.

We all know what happened next – governments became shy of carbon policy : the result was a promotion of economic consumption at the expense of precaution. Developed economies around the world abandoned energy conservation for more extreme fossil fuel use.

An uneasy international balance was achieved by the USA devoting significant diplomatic effort to their relationship with Saudi Arabia, and protecting energy supplies by sending young white (and black) Christian martyrs into unholy wars on oil and gas producer nations.

It must be hard for some entrenched positions to hear that climate change is actually really serious, after all. We can end the conversation with these sceptics – there are other issues we need to focus on, such as the risks from the militarisation of the melting Arctic.

Climate change “dissenters”, “dismissers” and “deniers” might find it hard to listen to the US Department of Defense trying to be upbeat and re-capture the agenda and the platform. Here’s Leon Panetta outlining some of the new story :-

“Panetta: Environment Emerges as National Security Concern : By Nick Simeone : American Forces Press Service : Washington, May 3, 2012 : Climate and environmental change are emerging as national security threats that weigh heavily in the Pentagon’s new strategy, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta told an environmental group last night. “The area of climate change has a dramatic impact on national security,” Panetta said here at a reception hosted by the Environmental Defense Fund to honor the Defense Department in advancing clean energy initiatives. “Rising sea levels, severe droughts, the melting of the polar caps, the more frequent and devastating natural disasters all raise demand for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief,” Panetta said. Panetta cited the melting of Arctic ice in renewing a longstanding call for the Senate to ratify the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea. More than 150 nations have accepted the treaty, which has been in force since the early 1990s, and a succession of U.S. government administrations have urged ratification. Among other things, the convention would guarantee various aspects of passage and overflight for the U.S. military. Panetta urged his audience to use their influence to push for treaty ratification. “We are the only industrialized nation that has not approved that treaty,” he said…”In the next fiscal year, we are going to be investing more than a billion dollars in more efficient aircraft and aircraft engines, in hybrid electric drives for our ships, in improved generators, in microgrids for combat bases and combat vehicle energy-efficient programs,” he said. “We are investing another billion dollars to make our installations here at home more energy-efficient, and we are using them as the test bed to demonstrate next-generation energy technologies.”

So, how will the international defence and intelligence communities take down the Frankenstein’s monster of opposition to climate change science that in effect they spawned themselves ? How are they going to bust the barricades of intransigent denial of the temperature and sea level gauges ?

You will find that the major meteorological research institutions in most developed countries are closely allied with their ministries of defence and intelligence. For example, the Met Office in the UK. There are competing issues at stake – the scientists cannot get too loud about climate change, because national security depends on economic stability – which rests partly on the profit and loss accounts of their energy sector businesses.

One or two scientists in the extended national security apparatus speak out – like James Hansen at NASA. But most people just keep their heads down.

This is where independent voices are so important to roll back the decades of climate change science scepticism. I hope knowledgable journalists and activists really rip to shreds the latest Heartland advertising campaign.

2 thoughts on “Psy Ops Gone Wrong”

  1. Is the campaign psyops, it makes the Heartland Institute an easy target, a bit like blaming McDonalds for obesity.

    The unabomber is a hero of mine, he recognizes the political expediency of violence, acts on the implications of his beliefs. What is twitter going to achieve, when all is said and done?

    [ COMMENT FROM JOABBESS.COM : I UNDERSTAND YOUR FRUSTRATION, DESERT STORM, AND I RECOGNISE YOUR CLARITY OF REALISATION, BUT I CANNOT ACCEPT THE USE OF VIOLENCE BY ANY PERSON FOR ANY REASON OR THROUGH ANY MEANS OR METHOD. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE OF ANY NATURE ACHIEVES ANYTHING OF ANY USE. TWITTER IS A USEFUL WAY OF PLUGGING INTO THE LARGER MIND OF HUMANITY – THE MACHINE THAT CAN COLLECTIVELY DISCERN FACT FROM PROPAGANDA – THE MACHINE THAT CAN SIFT PUBLIC RELATIONS FROM REALITY. TWITTER IS ALSO A MERRY DISTRACTION, AND FEEDS ON THE SAP OF HUMAN TENDENCIES TOWARDS ADDICTION. TWITTER IS A TOOL FOR DISCOVERY, BUT NOT A TOOL TO ENABLE SIGNIFICANT CHANGE. I THINK THAT IMPORTANT CHANGE IS COMING TO US, WHETHER WE STRIVE FOR IT OR NOT. THE HUMAN RACE HAS SET IN MOTION A WORLD-SCALE MACHINE OF DESTRUCTION – TEARING APART OUR OWN HABITAT, OUR OWN CIVILISATION. THIS CANNOT GO ON. THE DESTRUCTIVE MACHINE WILL FAIL. ALL THE COGS IN THE MACHINE HAVE INALIENABLE MOTIVATIONS; ALL THE JOINTS ARE WELL-OILED, BUT THE MACHINE WILL SEIZE UP. IF WE WATCH CAREFULLY AND ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS WE WILL SEE CHANGE COMING IN FULL AUDIOVISUAL TECHNICOLOUR GLORY ON ALL CHANNELS – YOU JUST NEED TO TUNE IN TO IT. JUST AS THERE HAS BEEN MORAL CORRUPTION OF THE WORLD’S MILITARIES WHICH IS BEING CHALLENGED BY WHISTLEBLOWING FROM AN INCREASING NUMBER OF INSIDERS, SO ALSO THE MORAL CORRUPTION IN THE WORLD’S ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS BEING LAID BARE, AND NOT FAR BEHIND IT, THE MORAL CORRUPTION OF THE ENERGY SECTOR WILL HEAVE INTO VIEW. ALL IS SHIFTING. CHANGE IS AFOOT. THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE’S SELF-INSTIGATED DOWNFALL WILL BE JUST A FOOTNOTE TO WHAT IS COMING NEXT… ]

  2. That was hilarious! All that effort and the first and only comment you get (apart from this my own) is someone who has the the Unabomber for a hero!
    You could not make it up!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *