<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Delingpole Is Most Definitely Misguided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/</link>
	<description>Heaping Truth on Climate Chaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Hi Jo.
Looks like you really got the nutters out in response. I feel for you having to weather the storm of indignant abuse from the modern day version of the flat earth society. Keep writing because someone has to take issue with the Delingpoles of this debate. I don&#039;t mind people asking meaningful questions but to wrap it all up in some kind conspiracy theory platform as he does (with such a self righteous demeanor to boot) is repulsively bizarre to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jo.<br />
Looks like you really got the nutters out in response. I feel for you having to weather the storm of indignant abuse from the modern day version of the flat earth society. Keep writing because someone has to take issue with the Delingpoles of this debate. I don&#8217;t mind people asking meaningful questions but to wrap it all up in some kind conspiracy theory platform as he does (with such a self righteous demeanor to boot) is repulsively bizarre to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfried</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your brilliant analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your brilliant analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony in Ormoc</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony in Ormoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Hey Jo, I am not a scientist, but I would like to ask you a simple question. 

How much money do you stand to gain or lose by these covert scientific research panels, on my dime, concluding that there is man made global warming? Why don&#039;t you first share with us, all your holdings in carbon offset companies, and what your personal stake is? 

I am very skeptical of all this, AG is no scientist, and a COMPLETE HYPOCRITE to say the very least. His jet setting around the world, eating steak like it was going out of style, all the while telling me to cut back, and buy HIS green energy. 

I am just a regular guy, living a regular life, and it makes me sick to see people like you, and the brand you like to run with, trying to scare the world with your tricks and scams. I believe with out a doubt, that you, and the scientists that represent this debacle, are hiding the truth. The climate will change, with of without the help of man kind. 

I am sure that the global recession/depression will not effect those at the top, and the gap between those at the top, will only increase. This is a move towards power and absolute government rule, over the masses that are too dumb, in the eyes of the elitists, to function with out elitist control. 

These phony carbon offset programs, and the economically devastating cap and trade tactics are nothing more than a way to reshape global economics. It is our fault that we let the radical leftwing loons come to power, and begin forcing this crap down our throats. There is so little supporting your claims, unless you trust manipulated data, that won&#039;t be shared with the overall scientific community. I ain&#039;t buying it, and most of the world is saying the same thing. 

You believe what you want, but when the time comes, if your plans come to pass, and the world is thrown into economic recoil over this BS, I personally would be running for the hills, and seeking shelter, cause there is going to be hell to pay for those that destroyed the economy, and the world as we know it. And I am not talking about Ford, or GM...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jo, I am not a scientist, but I would like to ask you a simple question. </p>
<p>How much money do you stand to gain or lose by these covert scientific research panels, on my dime, concluding that there is man made global warming? Why don&#8217;t you first share with us, all your holdings in carbon offset companies, and what your personal stake is? </p>
<p>I am very skeptical of all this, AG is no scientist, and a COMPLETE HYPOCRITE to say the very least. His jet setting around the world, eating steak like it was going out of style, all the while telling me to cut back, and buy HIS green energy. </p>
<p>I am just a regular guy, living a regular life, and it makes me sick to see people like you, and the brand you like to run with, trying to scare the world with your tricks and scams. I believe with out a doubt, that you, and the scientists that represent this debacle, are hiding the truth. The climate will change, with of without the help of man kind. </p>
<p>I am sure that the global recession/depression will not effect those at the top, and the gap between those at the top, will only increase. This is a move towards power and absolute government rule, over the masses that are too dumb, in the eyes of the elitists, to function with out elitist control. </p>
<p>These phony carbon offset programs, and the economically devastating cap and trade tactics are nothing more than a way to reshape global economics. It is our fault that we let the radical leftwing loons come to power, and begin forcing this crap down our throats. There is so little supporting your claims, unless you trust manipulated data, that won&#8217;t be shared with the overall scientific community. I ain&#8217;t buying it, and most of the world is saying the same thing. </p>
<p>You believe what you want, but when the time comes, if your plans come to pass, and the world is thrown into economic recoil over this BS, I personally would be running for the hills, and seeking shelter, cause there is going to be hell to pay for those that destroyed the economy, and the world as we know it. And I am not talking about Ford, or GM&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreemonSandleWould</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>FreemonSandleWould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-299</guid>
		<description>If by misguided you mean &quot;is honest&quot; or &quot;can see a scam when he has one plainly in front of his nose&quot; then yes Mr. Delingpole is misguided.

You on the other hand are quite the opposite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by misguided you mean &#8220;is honest&#8221; or &#8220;can see a scam when he has one plainly in front of his nose&#8221; then yes Mr. Delingpole is misguided.</p>
<p>You on the other hand are quite the opposite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now Global Warming has stopped - Page 4 - The Liverpool Way</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Now Global Warming has stopped - Page 4 - The Liverpool Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] not on a Telegraph blog - so here&#039;s someone else giving an opposing view to James Delingpole. James Delingpole Is Most Definitely Misguided @ Jo Abbess  And gwapple me gwapenuts if I ever pay much attention to some 1970s telly presenter pretending to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not on a Telegraph blog &#8211; so here&#39;s someone else giving an opposing view to James Delingpole. James Delingpole Is Most Definitely Misguided @ Jo Abbess  And gwapple me gwapenuts if I ever pay much attention to some 1970s telly presenter pretending to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realhot</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>realhot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Aint it a pitty that not all journalists are tame like Scott Harrabin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aint it a pitty that not all journalists are tame like Scott Harrabin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&quot;My third piece of advice : trust the scientists, not the journalists, especially those who appear unable to see through the propaganda of disinformation&quot;

My third piece of advice: trust the scientists, not the politicians. The scientists are saying that the science is uncertain at most. Many scientists are saying that the models are wrong, that human activity does not systematically, predictably and significantly affect global climate (which is the position of the climate panickers).

It is not about denial. It is about scepticism. Until there is evidence we will not destroy our lives and those of the poor in developing countries to satisfy ex-communists who have no other way of realising their socialist utopian dream than create world-wide panic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My third piece of advice : trust the scientists, not the journalists, especially those who appear unable to see through the propaganda of disinformation&#8221;</p>
<p>My third piece of advice: trust the scientists, not the politicians. The scientists are saying that the science is uncertain at most. Many scientists are saying that the models are wrong, that human activity does not systematically, predictably and significantly affect global climate (which is the position of the climate panickers).</p>
<p>It is not about denial. It is about scepticism. Until there is evidence we will not destroy our lives and those of the poor in developing countries to satisfy ex-communists who have no other way of realising their socialist utopian dream than create world-wide panic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil McG</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, Big Jo. This is the most-commented-on entry in your blog, and you got **********!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, Big Jo. This is the most-commented-on entry in your blog, and you got **********!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-207</guid>
		<description>P.S. And you would have avoided direct, unequivocal, shameless lies such as, &quot;I’m going to pass over the tiresome claims of withholding access to data, which is just unmitigated fluff&quot;. How much of the remainder of the article consists of lies?

The researchers, including the UK Met office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://my-own-doubts.blogspot.com/2009/09/more-climate-politics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;refuse to release the data&lt;/a&gt;, which is against normal scientific practice. In fact it makes the normal processes of science impossible, and means that none of the conclusions are, strictly speaking, science at all! Nothing the Hadley centre produces, nothing the Climate Research Unit in UEA produces is science until they release the raw data so others can check it.

Incredibly, the reason given is that others might look for errors, and might make them look bad! You couldn&#039;t make it up. &quot;Sorry, we won&#039;t release the data so it can be checked, because you will look for errors we might have made, or you might make us look bad&quot;, presumably when errors are found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. And you would have avoided direct, unequivocal, shameless lies such as, &#8220;I’m going to pass over the tiresome claims of withholding access to data, which is just unmitigated fluff&#8221;. How much of the remainder of the article consists of lies?</p>
<p>The researchers, including the UK Met office, <a href="http://my-own-doubts.blogspot.com/2009/09/more-climate-politics.html" rel="nofollow">refuse to release the data</a>, which is against normal scientific practice. In fact it makes the normal processes of science impossible, and means that none of the conclusions are, strictly speaking, science at all! Nothing the Hadley centre produces, nothing the Climate Research Unit in UEA produces is science until they release the raw data so others can check it.</p>
<p>Incredibly, the reason given is that others might look for errors, and might make them look bad! You couldn&#8217;t make it up. &#8220;Sorry, we won&#8217;t release the data so it can be checked, because you will look for errors we might have made, or you might make us look bad&#8221;, presumably when errors are found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/29/james-delingpole-is-most-definitely-misguided/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1951#comment-205</guid>
		<description>It would have been much quicker, Ms Abbess, and mean essentially the same, if you were simply to have written &quot;La, la, la, la, la, la, I&#039;m not listening, la, la, la, la, la, we must be changing the climate because that is what I want to believe, la la, not listening! I don&#039;t know why you are talking because I am not listening, la, la, la, la, la, la, I can&#039;t hear anything you&#039;re saying, la, la, la, la&quot;

You could also pu your fingers in your ears, although it isn&#039;t essential as we can&#039;t see you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been much quicker, Ms Abbess, and mean essentially the same, if you were simply to have written &#8220;La, la, la, la, la, la, I&#8217;m not listening, la, la, la, la, la, we must be changing the climate because that is what I want to believe, la la, not listening! I don&#8217;t know why you are talking because I am not listening, la, la, la, la, la, la, I can&#8217;t hear anything you&#8217;re saying, la, la, la, la&#8221;</p>
<p>You could also pu your fingers in your ears, although it isn&#8217;t essential as we can&#8217;t see you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
