<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter to James Delingpole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/</link>
	<description>Heaping Truth on Climate Chaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-582</guid>
		<description>You are an idiot.

I&#039;m with Delingpole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an idiot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Delingpole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Pete Lee - one sane voice against the madness.  As you say, why are these people always so rude and angry?  Could it be that they envy those of us who have science degrees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Lee &#8211; one sane voice against the madness.  As you say, why are these people always so rude and angry?  Could it be that they envy those of us who have science degrees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squalor and Genamum</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Squalor and Genamum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Goreflakes keep falling on my head.
But that doesn&#039;t mean the global warming meme is dead!
Denying works for me! So-
I&#039;m gonna simply change the game by reframing
reality. 
you see - 
post normal science is a great consensus - 
a mystery - the wizardry of false pretenses.

Goreflakes keep falling on my head.
But that doesn&#039;t mean the climate funding cow is dead!
Everyone agrees 
on
the need to investigate the whole situation.
New ministries!

Nothing&#039;s worrying me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goreflakes keep falling on my head.<br />
But that doesn&#8217;t mean the global warming meme is dead!<br />
Denying works for me! So-<br />
I&#8217;m gonna simply change the game by reframing<br />
reality.<br />
you see &#8211;<br />
post normal science is a great consensus &#8211;<br />
a mystery &#8211; the wizardry of false pretenses.</p>
<p>Goreflakes keep falling on my head.<br />
But that doesn&#8217;t mean the climate funding cow is dead!<br />
Everyone agrees<br />
on<br />
the need to investigate the whole situation.<br />
New ministries!</p>
<p>Nothing&#8217;s worrying me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I have been struck by the rudeness and vitriol which the deniers have attacked you. I too have a science degree and I find the evidence for climate change compelling.Having one does not mean you are better but it given Delingbore&#039;s interest you would think he may try and undertake one. I am sure he wouldn&#039;t stop talking about it as he does the WW2 as if he is the only person who knows.

I am unclear about the attack on your degree- i.e. you are being elitist. If I were writing about Hitler I would not expect to be as informed as some one who did not go to Uni .

However Delingbore rarely quotes science. If he did he may have a better case. 

Its typical of his type  to attack with vitriol and then plead hurt when its done to them. He can dish it but he can&#039;t take it.

At heart the evidence for climate change is statistical rather than physical however and as such I suggest Delingsore ( or however you spell the idiot&#039;s name) and his ilk go back to school and redo their stats module in GCSE.

So there you have it Jo 

James Delingbore/ sore- thank me when you use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been struck by the rudeness and vitriol which the deniers have attacked you. I too have a science degree and I find the evidence for climate change compelling.Having one does not mean you are better but it given Delingbore&#8217;s interest you would think he may try and undertake one. I am sure he wouldn&#8217;t stop talking about it as he does the WW2 as if he is the only person who knows.</p>
<p>I am unclear about the attack on your degree- i.e. you are being elitist. If I were writing about Hitler I would not expect to be as informed as some one who did not go to Uni .</p>
<p>However Delingbore rarely quotes science. If he did he may have a better case. </p>
<p>Its typical of his type  to attack with vitriol and then plead hurt when its done to them. He can dish it but he can&#8217;t take it.</p>
<p>At heart the evidence for climate change is statistical rather than physical however and as such I suggest Delingsore ( or however you spell the idiot&#8217;s name) and his ilk go back to school and redo their stats module in GCSE.</p>
<p>So there you have it Jo </p>
<p>James Delingbore/ sore- thank me when you use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I think everyone above me has said what needed to be, except that your position is frankly laughable. 

I hope you can continue to feel intellectually superior to individuals without a degree. 

Perhaps it&#039;s a good thing then that you seem to spend most of your time with the other green fruity loops. Otherwise you might find your position less tenable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone above me has said what needed to be, except that your position is frankly laughable. </p>
<p>I hope you can continue to feel intellectually superior to individuals without a degree. </p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a good thing then that you seem to spend most of your time with the other green fruity loops. Otherwise you might find your position less tenable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-314</guid>
		<description>I too have a degree or two. One is a physics degree, mine is from Liverpool.  I agree with the first two posters.  You come across as a pompous arse and Delingpole is more than qualified to assess nonsense when nonsense is obvious to all.

Keep up the good work. People like you will kill AGW faster than it will die by the strength of its own failed &#039;science&#039; alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have a degree or two. One is a physics degree, mine is from Liverpool.  I agree with the first two posters.  You come across as a pompous arse and Delingpole is more than qualified to assess nonsense when nonsense is obvious to all.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work. People like you will kill AGW faster than it will die by the strength of its own failed &#8217;science&#8217; alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Only one degree? Go away and become a proper academic, do some research then you can question others qualifications.


Would you care to explain Monbiots &#039;training&#039; other than a degree in that climate related subject called Zoology?

Or Al Gore?
Leonardo DiCaprio?
Darryl Hanna?

Oh I forgot its OK from one side......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one degree? Go away and become a proper academic, do some research then you can question others qualifications.</p>
<p>Would you care to explain Monbiots &#8216;training&#8217; other than a degree in that climate related subject called Zoology?</p>
<p>Or Al Gore?<br />
Leonardo DiCaprio?<br />
Darryl Hanna?</p>
<p>Oh I forgot its OK from one side&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been of the belief that science was about theories and not consensus, science is never settled there is always a new discover on the horizon. That is why humanity has always strived to find new knowledge and break away from its own dogma and superstitions.  Your views on global warming appear to be akin to a medieval pope, as decrying anyone who holds a different opinion to your own as a heritic.  If you are indeed correct and Mr Delingpole is not then surely your scientific case would hold up but instead you try to taint his work and question his legitimacy to express an opinion.  This is not the act of a rational scientist but someone fighting from a weak position.  

You suggest he may be a lightweight, but it would appear to me that is in fact you who is the lightweight afterall you&#039;re the one who feels the need to quote your BSc to try to legistimise your beliefs and denigrate Mr Delingpoles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been of the belief that science was about theories and not consensus, science is never settled there is always a new discover on the horizon. That is why humanity has always strived to find new knowledge and break away from its own dogma and superstitions.  Your views on global warming appear to be akin to a medieval pope, as decrying anyone who holds a different opinion to your own as a heritic.  If you are indeed correct and Mr Delingpole is not then surely your scientific case would hold up but instead you try to taint his work and question his legitimacy to express an opinion.  This is not the act of a rational scientist but someone fighting from a weak position.  </p>
<p>You suggest he may be a lightweight, but it would appear to me that is in fact you who is the lightweight afterall you&#8217;re the one who feels the need to quote your BSc to try to legistimise your beliefs and denigrate Mr Delingpoles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted D. Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted D. Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-166</guid>
		<description>When I first was directed to this site by the honourable Mr. Delingpole&#039;s blog I wondered, what is it that drives your interest in so called climate change... What is it that drives you to have to write an open letter to James Delingpole?

Then I spotted the tabs &#039;Recruit Me&#039; and &#039;Hire Me&#039; at the top of the page, and I realised what drives you.

Money.

Why will scientists never discover a cure for Cancer?

Because the money injected into research means they can never cure cancer but still get rich.

XxX

Not only that but I can guarantee another thing. In two hundred years we almost certainly won&#039;t be talking about climate change in the way we do now.

(That is of course assuming that climate change won&#039;t turn the World upside down. ;))

We&#039;ll be talking about it in the same way we mock the ideas of Cosmas Indicopleustes and everyone else who believed in a flat Earth.

XxX

See every generation has to have a scare, something to drive the Sheeple into submission.

See, before climate change became the in thing there was Y2K.

The US Govt. alone spent over $100 Bil. on fixing the bug. (See my point on Cancer research.)

As well as that how much money did companies like Wal-Mart make by selling the whole Y2K thing?

Clothing companies, superstores, electronics producers are all driving the legend of the Fox (In this case climate change.) into the the Sheep. Conveniently they get EXTRA money from the consumer for making things more CO2 friendly.

And I&#039;m only scratching the surface of this &#039;elaborate&#039; money making scheme.

I haven&#039;t even got into Taxes in order to make the World more CO2 friendly and what have you.

XxX

Regardless.

Congratulations. You found a target who you thought was weak. The person who is flawed is not Mr. Delingpole, but you. Course, you&#039;re probably to far up yourself to notice that what with that education of yours.

Start bragging about your education when you&#039;ve walked out of Oxford, Cambridge or MIT. Warwick might rank sixth on the Times best University rankings but to me and most others it means jack. 

As for education when Mr. Delingpole was in school they were looking at other things to cause fear, as opposed to climate change.

Not only that but the scientific &#039;fact&#039; being taught to the youth of Britain today, isn&#039;t scientific fact. Relating to climate change everything taught in the classroom regarding the said farce is highly opinionated, with know room for any kind of debate.

Of course, resistance is futile.

&quot;Can you be relied upon for Global Warming science and news, or not?&quot;

More so than the elitist who brags (And yes you do brag!) about her education, yet fails three times at placing question marks in her letter to Mr. Delingpole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first was directed to this site by the honourable Mr. Delingpole&#8217;s blog I wondered, what is it that drives your interest in so called climate change&#8230; What is it that drives you to have to write an open letter to James Delingpole?</p>
<p>Then I spotted the tabs &#8216;Recruit Me&#8217; and &#8216;Hire Me&#8217; at the top of the page, and I realised what drives you.</p>
<p>Money.</p>
<p>Why will scientists never discover a cure for Cancer?</p>
<p>Because the money injected into research means they can never cure cancer but still get rich.</p>
<p>XxX</p>
<p>Not only that but I can guarantee another thing. In two hundred years we almost certainly won&#8217;t be talking about climate change in the way we do now.</p>
<p>(That is of course assuming that climate change won&#8217;t turn the World upside down. <img src='http://www.joabbess.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be talking about it in the same way we mock the ideas of Cosmas Indicopleustes and everyone else who believed in a flat Earth.</p>
<p>XxX</p>
<p>See every generation has to have a scare, something to drive the Sheeple into submission.</p>
<p>See, before climate change became the in thing there was Y2K.</p>
<p>The US Govt. alone spent over $100 Bil. on fixing the bug. (See my point on Cancer research.)</p>
<p>As well as that how much money did companies like Wal-Mart make by selling the whole Y2K thing?</p>
<p>Clothing companies, superstores, electronics producers are all driving the legend of the Fox (In this case climate change.) into the the Sheep. Conveniently they get EXTRA money from the consumer for making things more CO2 friendly.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m only scratching the surface of this &#8216;elaborate&#8217; money making scheme.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t even got into Taxes in order to make the World more CO2 friendly and what have you.</p>
<p>XxX</p>
<p>Regardless.</p>
<p>Congratulations. You found a target who you thought was weak. The person who is flawed is not Mr. Delingpole, but you. Course, you&#8217;re probably to far up yourself to notice that what with that education of yours.</p>
<p>Start bragging about your education when you&#8217;ve walked out of Oxford, Cambridge or MIT. Warwick might rank sixth on the Times best University rankings but to me and most others it means jack. </p>
<p>As for education when Mr. Delingpole was in school they were looking at other things to cause fear, as opposed to climate change.</p>
<p>Not only that but the scientific &#8216;fact&#8217; being taught to the youth of Britain today, isn&#8217;t scientific fact. Relating to climate change everything taught in the classroom regarding the said farce is highly opinionated, with know room for any kind of debate.</p>
<p>Of course, resistance is futile.</p>
<p>&#8220;Can you be relied upon for Global Warming science and news, or not?&#8221;</p>
<p>More so than the elitist who brags (And yes you do brag!) about her education, yet fails three times at placing question marks in her letter to Mr. Delingpole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.joabbess.com/2009/09/24/letter-to-james-delingpole/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joabbess.com/?p=1842#comment-159</guid>
		<description>And what precisely are your scientific studies in the field of climatology that enables you the set yourself up as an expert on the subject? Not having a degree does not mean that you are unable to understand. You seem to be taking a very elitist attitude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what precisely are your scientific studies in the field of climatology that enables you the set yourself up as an expert on the subject? Not having a degree does not mean that you are unable to understand. You seem to be taking a very elitist attitude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
